AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Mustang Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Lounge | Mustang Tech | Members Gallery | Member Albums | Timeslips | Kill Stories | Tech | Regional 
 

Reply
 
Old 01-26-2004   #1 (permalink)
MohMustang is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10 Threads: 2
 MohMustang's Country Flag
bahrain   Alabama
Smile 5.0L vs. 4.6L

hi every body

I am new in this forums I need your help I will go to buy a mustang (1995 or 1997)

I want to ask which is beter Engine for the 5.0L(1995) or the 4.6L(1997)

and what the differant between they, which is good for more HP

thanks for help,

sorry about bad grammer and spiling (I am from kingdom of bahrain) :o

this is a pic of my frind mustang
Attached Thumbnails
5-0l-vs-4-6l-mustang-2.jpg  
__________________
none
MohMustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2004   #2 (permalink)
1998GT is offline Top Dog

4.6L Member


Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,638 Threads: 236
 1998GT's Country Flag
Philippines
Send a message via AIM to 1998GT
Default

i love the 4.6 modulars... with a simeple headswap you will see morehp and torque than the 99+ gt stangs.. the 5.0s do have more mods available, but i love the 4.6 and wouild never swap it out for anything.
__________________
Join Date: Sept 02
1998GT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2004   #3 (permalink)
Twister is offline Top Dog


Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,602 Threads: 245
 Twister's Country Flag  View Twister's 14 photos
Phoenix   Arizona
Default

meanwhile, there are guys that wont run anything other than a 5.0....
Twister is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2004   #4 (permalink)
wilit is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 951 Threads: 13
 wilit's Country Flag  View wilit's HomePage
Hayward   California
Default

It depends how much money you're willing to spend, and how much time you're willing to invest in mod'ing a motor. If you're only thinking of doing bolt-on's, with a head swap being the most invasive mod, I'd say go with a 4.6. It'll make more HP than a 5.0 with similar specs. But if you're gonna go all out, I'd say go with the '95 and build some outragous stroker. Like a 347, or a 427. With a 427, you should be able to see 400rwhp easily in N/A trim.
wilit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2004   #5 (permalink)
Fordgazm is offline Top Dog

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,290 Threads: 297
 Fordgazm's Country Flag  View Fordgazm's 3 products for your review  View Fordgazm's HomePage
Wayne   Ohio
Send a message via Yahoo to Fordgazm
Default

I vote for the 5.0 See my new sig
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience...
Fordgazm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2004   #6 (permalink)
MohMustang is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10 Threads: 2
 MohMustang's Country Flag
bahrain   Alabama
Default

I will go to a basic mod such as headers, full exhust system, msd igntion box, igntion wire, TB, pulley, porting the head and some NOS(75shot)

now if I will but this mods in the 5.0 and 4.6 which will give me more power

I hear that the SOHC will give me more power than the OHV bcoz the Efficiency of the SOHC more than the OHV

what you thinks
__________________
none
MohMustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2004   #7 (permalink)
Mana4Real is offline Top Dog

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,223 Threads: 258
 Mana4Real's Country Flag  View Mana4Real's HomePage
San Ramon   California
Send a message via AIM to Mana4Real Send a message via Yahoo to Mana4Real
Default

Both of em have their ups and downs... It's all personal preference.
__________________
-Matt
Mana4Real is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2004   #8 (permalink)
kit
kit is offline Made Member


Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 407 Threads: 25
 kit's Country Flag  View kit's 4 photos  View kit's HomePage
Sierra Vista   Arizona
Default

I'm all for a 4.6, I wouldn't trade mine for the world. I would go for 99+ though if you could pull it off.
__________________
2003 Dodge 1500 quad cab, 4x4, Hemi, fully loaded.

1964 Ford Ranchero Falcon.

Still trying to get a mustang like my last one............
kit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2004   #9 (permalink)
Monkey Boy is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,232 Threads: 175
 Monkey Boy's Country Flag  View Monkey Boy's 2 photos
Aiken   South Carolina
Default

You will get more horsepower with the 5.0 out of the modifications you listed because the 96-98 GT's have poor flowing heads and intake manifold. If you put the heads and intake of the 99+ GT's on a 96-98 and then do those mods, you will get more power out of the 4.6.
__________________
2008 Toyota Tacoma Prerunner SR5 Reg Cab
2.7 4 banger
No mods (yet...)

2002 V6 manual coupe (SOLD)
Monkey Boy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2004   #10 (permalink)
rks'92/5.0 is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 405 Threads: 11
 rks'92/5.0's Country Flag
Allentown   Pennsylvania
Default

per dollar spent i think a 5.0 is a better bargain.
rks'92/5.0 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2004   #11 (permalink)
jruppert is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 573 Threads: 95
 jruppert's Country Flag  View jruppert's 2 photos  View jruppert's HomePage
Big Rapids, Michigan   Michigan
Send a message via AIM to jruppert Send a message via MSN to jruppert
Default

I would definitely go the 5.0 The parts are more common and more cost effective.
__________________
13.4@106mph (on old 302, no ET's on stroker yet)
'94 GT 347 Stroker, TFS stage 2 cam (.542 lift), AFR 185 heads, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, 30 lb injectors, 77mm Pro-M, Fox Accufab 75mm Throttle Body, 255lph fuel pump, Mac fox style Long Tube headers, Tremec TKO, aluminum driveshaft, 3.73 gears , Flowmaster 2 chamber, chrome Cobra R 17x9's, Steeda radiator, Eibach Sportline springs, Tweecer RT
jruppert is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2004   #12 (permalink)
GTRaptor is offline Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,629 Threads: 152
 GTRaptor's Country Flag  View GTRaptor's 605 photos  View GTRaptor's 69 products for your review  View GTRaptor's HomePage
Mexico City
Send a message via Yahoo to GTRaptor
Default

5.0 definately, easier to mod and cheaper, not to mention SIMPLER.
It is not just the cost of the parts, some installs on 4.6s are a bit more complex compared to a 5.0.

Also the 5.0 engine is pretty common in other Fords so i bet you will have less problems with the local technicians. Not many will be up to the task to touch a 4.6.

Performance wise both are similar, and will get similar results from a HEAD,CAM and INTAKE swap, more less 300HP.
__________________
Rob Hernandez, AFM
GTRaptor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2004   #13 (permalink)
STONECOLD is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,164 Threads: 45
 STONECOLD's Country Flag  View STONECOLD's 7 photos
N.Y.C.   New York
Send a message via AIM to STONECOLD
Default

5.0
__________________
1995 Mustang GT 5.0
BBK CAI, Pro-M 75mm MAF, Pro-M Optimizer, BBK 70mm TB, GT-40 Intake, 24# Injectors, AFR 165's, 1.7 Roller rockers, Crane 2040 cam (E-303) BBK Equal Length headers, BBK O/R X-pipe, Flowmaster American Thunder 2 Chambers. FMS 3.73 Gears, Lentech AODE 2800 stall, BBK 255lph Fuel Pump, BBK Fuel Pressure Regulator. MSD 6AL, Steeda UDP's, FMS Aluminum drive shaft, Autologic chip Larocca tune.
STONECOLD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004   #14 (permalink)
Adam94GT is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 552 Threads: 26
 Adam94GT's Country Flag  View Adam94GT's HomePage
O'Fallon   Missouri
Send a message via ICQ to Adam94GT Send a message via AIM to Adam94GT Send a message via Yahoo to Adam94GT
Default

It's a no-brainer, 5.0! 16 valve 4.6s are dogs.

If you want more of a challenge, 4.6.
__________________
Adam M. Bullard
1994 Mustang GT
Too many mods since last E.T.
Adam94GT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004   #15 (permalink)
Icepick is offline Rookie


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10 Threads: 0
Default

Mod for mod the 5.0 is cheaper than the 4.6 you listed and produces the same or more power.


Plus it's a freaking 5.0
__________________
1990 Conv GT
Icepick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5.0L vs 5.0L "HO" 5.0L Tech 8 02-15-2009 10:42 AM
5.0L vs 4.6L Is our 05 GT's the fastest? Dubl10 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 18 08-28-2005 11:29 PM
HELP!! 5.0L HID/Xenon Converter Kits?? mustangspouse 5.0L Tech 1 03-10-2005 03:06 PM
4.6L to 5.0L Swap kevngarnett 4.6L Tech 4 03-09-2005 11:23 AM
Power up for a 93 5.0L HO 5.0L Tech 0 04-05-2002 12:04 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112