AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Mustang Tech > Power Adders
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Lounge | Mustang Tech | Power Adders | Drag Racing | Road Racing | Audio & Alarms | Show & Shine | Tech 
 

Reply
 
Old 08-27-2005   #1 (permalink)
Bluestoval is offline Rookie


Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3 Threads: 2
Default ProCharger says 510RWHP on stock motor?

Ok, ProCharger says 510RWHP on a stock motor running 91 octane pump gas.

The link is here: http://www.procharger.com/2005_mustang_600hp.shtml

Does anyone know the "catch" to this. That number just seems high.

Thanks!
__________________
2002 F150 Lariat FX4 5.4L
ATI ProCharger, Fuel Mods
Snow Water Injection, FTVB
Bluestoval is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2005   #2 (permalink)
hotwheels is offline Made Member

2.3L Member
4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 585 Threads: 7
 hotwheels's Country Flag  View hotwheels's 7 photos  View hotwheels's HomePage
Cheyenne   Wyoming
Default

it's possible, i just wouldn't bank on it being all around safe horsepower.........but 14psi is alot of boost on an engine that already has 300 hp.........
__________________
my cars:
1992 mustang gt twinturbo'd
1988 mustang gt bottlefed
2004 mach 1 collecting dust
1989 mustang coupe 4cyl.
1980 mustang coupe 4cyl.
Insanemustangs.com
hotwheels is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #3 (permalink)
12second5.0 is offline Rookie


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 37 Threads: 2
San Antonio,Texas
Send a message via AIM to 12second5.0
Default

You are in the area hp wise of splitting the block........
12second5.0 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005   #4 (permalink)
Boombotz is offline Rookie


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5 Threads: 0
Default

Someone mentioned that you are in the area of splitting the block well my question is: What is a good psi to look at when installing a procharger on the new 05 or 06 v8 mustang. I am also new to this and I was wondering do you have to take out the engine to add a supercharger? If you do how much did you guys pay (if you did) to put this bolt-on on? Also this would be a everyday driver. I want something with BALLS on the road!!! you all know what i mean


Sorry for being so new to this but its better to learn now then never
Boombotz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005   #5 (permalink)
hotwheels is offline Made Member

2.3L Member
4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 585 Threads: 7
 hotwheels's Country Flag  View hotwheels's 7 photos  View hotwheels's HomePage
Cheyenne   Wyoming
Default

you don't have to remove the engine to install a supercharger.....one thing you need to worry about on your 4.6 litre is the internal's.....they aren't top of the line and therefore if you get greedy with the boost, you take a chance on damaging your engine....if you buy one, just go for 8psi and be happy with that till you get your internal's done...

hotwheels of insanemustangs
__________________
my cars:
1992 mustang gt twinturbo'd
1988 mustang gt bottlefed
2004 mach 1 collecting dust
1989 mustang coupe 4cyl.
1980 mustang coupe 4cyl.
Insanemustangs.com
hotwheels is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005   #6 (permalink)
Mana4Real is offline Top Dog

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,223 Threads: 258
 Mana4Real's Country Flag  View Mana4Real's HomePage
San Ramon   California
Send a message via AIM to Mana4Real Send a message via Yahoo to Mana4Real
Default

I wouldn't run that much boost on a stock motor. Anywhere from 8-10 PSI was always safe on the 99-04 GT's. I don't know how well the new motors fair up to the old. But, it's all in the tune.
__________________
-Matt
Mana4Real is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2005   #7 (permalink)
blueoval6 is offline Rookie


Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1 Threads: 0
 View blueoval6's HomePage
Delano/Tennessee
Send a message via MSN to blueoval6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mana4Real
I wouldn't run that much boost on a stock motor. Anywhere from 8-10 PSI was always safe on the 99-04 GT's. I don't know how well the new motors fair up to the old. But, it's all in the tune.
I am not that proud of ford with their 4.6 I have blown 2 and am on my third one now. And since the first motor I have had a 02 engine. I know the some people run 10-12 with vortex. But one has now rebuilt his but after a year or so. He had 456 rwhp. So I would be worried about running to much I would say 6-8; also matters what else you have done.
blueoval6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2005   #8 (permalink)
fin1 is offline Apprentice

S197 Member


Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 189 Threads: 4
 fin1's Country Flag  View fin1's HomePage
Pittsburgh   Pennsylvania
Default

Having a procharger I looked into this too. Talked to a few people I trust that are pushing the 4.6L to their max and they don't recommend anything above 10-11 psi (~450rwhp), especially a daily driver which I have. The consensus seems to be the bottom end will go first. I know of a performance shop running over 500 rwhp turbo kit that is 99% stock but they are doing it with the knowledge, expertise and funds to see where these limits are.

__________________
Silver 2005 Mustang GT

PowerHouse: Turbo & Chassis/Suspension
Fox Lake: Short Block & Heads
Complete Mod List: See my WWW homepage

Brad
fin1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2005   #9 (permalink)
Mana4Real is offline Top Dog

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,223 Threads: 258
 Mana4Real's Country Flag  View Mana4Real's HomePage
San Ramon   California
Send a message via AIM to Mana4Real Send a message via Yahoo to Mana4Real
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fin1
Having a procharger I looked into this too. Talked to a few people I trust that are pushing the 4.6L to their max and they don't recommend anything above 10-11 psi (~450rwhp), especially a daily driver which I have. The consensus seems to be the bottom end will go first. I know of a performance shop running over 500 rwhp turbo kit that is 99% stock but they are doing it with the knowledge, expertise and funds to see where these limits are.

Ya, a turbo kit will make way more power at the same boost level because of efficency. Procharger says no more then 10 on a stock bottom end for a 99-04
__________________
-Matt
Mana4Real is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005   #10 (permalink)
MadMatt is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 462 Threads: 35
 MadMatt's Country Flag  View MadMatt's 6 photos
Edmonton   Alberta
Default

My dad's got a new procharger on his 05 GT and it has been fine so far. It is a 9-10 PSI boost supercharger with intercooler and he is getting over 500 HP at the rear wheels when they dyno-tuned it. It was installed by Ford's SVT team at a local dealership and the warranty was kept in tact. I have to say that with the supercharger the car's really got some balls and even with stock suspension and wheels the car still sticks pretty good on dry pavement. He will be bringing it to the track to get some ET's in the spring.
__________________
1988 Mustang GT - 331, hand ported Twisted Wedge heads, TFS Stage 2 cam, R-Series intake, 1 3/4 long tubes, dual 3" exhaust, tko 600, Zex 100 shot, ect.

357 rwhp/ 361 rwtq on motor
428 rwhp/ 484 rwtq on 100 shot

12.48 @ 111 mph on motor (2200ft + elevation)
11.7 @ 120 mph on 100 shot (2200ft + elevation)
MadMatt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005   #11 (permalink)
Waxed'05 GT is offline Senior Member

S197 Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,451 Threads: 15
 Waxed'05 GT's Country Flag  View Waxed'05 GT's 10 photos
Aurora   Illinois
Send a message via Yahoo to Waxed'05 GT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotwheels
it's possible, i just wouldn't bank on it being all around safe horsepower.........but 14psi is alot of boost on an engine that already has 300 hp.........
From everywhere I have read it's not about how much boost with an engine with 300hp stock. It's about boosting at high psi's on an engine at a high compression ratio stock.

Also, I have read that the block is good for around 700hp and the weakest link is in the pistons due to their ring placement and secondly the materials used. I personally will not go much over 425 rwhp before changing out the internals.

My big question when selecting boost is.. do I want a twin screw type for big torque gains or a standard s/c for greater hp gains. And if torque is the answer what is a safe maximum for torque on a stock engine.
__________________
'06 GT---Mods---Tunable Inductions Intake, Fully Polished Pypes Violator Mufflers, MAG Mirror Inserts, Sequential Tail Lights, CDC Hood Struts, Powder Coated Valve Covers, Window Tints, Pioneer Premier DEH-P880PRS Head Unit, 8" Kicker Door Subs (SSMB8)
Front: Infinity mids/tweets 6812cf; Rear: Polk db570 mids/tweets------ Awaiting Install ---Eibach Pro Kit, DSpecs
Waxed'05 GT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006   #12 (permalink)
ro51468 is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 270 Threads: 12
 ro51468's Country Flag  View ro51468's HomePage
Vancouver   Washington
Default

Great numbers, but questions that always need to asked wheter it is SAE vs. Standard HP, when were the runs made, in 40 degree weather or 85 degree weather or was it a loading dyno vs a non loading dyno. ATI builds a great product, no question. We really like the product.
Obviously product manufacturers regardless of who they are, always post the best early morning runs. On heat soak, an engine can lose 25-30 HP per run. I have seen it on the dyno and it happens at the track every weekend.

Ron
ro51468 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006   #13 (permalink)
notenoughhuff is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4 Threads: 0
omaha, ne
Default

i dont know about procharger but maybe a vortech because there was an article in the january 2006 issue of Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords and it tested an 8 mile old 2005 gt and it got about 510 hp on an entirely stock engine.
notenoughhuff is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2006   #14 (permalink)
Born To Run is offline Apprentice

S197 Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 82 Threads: 27
 Born To Run's Country Flag  View Born To Run's 4 photos
Toronto   Ontario
Default supercharger

So what is the safe amount of boost,Roush program for 5psi,it can go to 8 psi.They spent 6 mil in R&D & i think they know what is a safe operating range accross the board,ie engine internals,warm weather,cold weather,altitude etc.What are your thoughts?
Born To Run is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SVo block vs. stock 88 block mustang_mason 2.3L Tech 1 06-21-2005 12:26 AM
MSD 6AL ignition on stock motor Nihon94GT 94-95 Tech 1 05-09-2005 09:31 PM
Motor tunning question tostaroller Drag Racing 1 01-21-2005 05:27 PM
I have a stock motor..what should RPM should I shift at 5.0L Tech 4 12-29-2001 02:32 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112