AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Mustang Tech > Power Adders
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Lounge | Mustang Tech | Power Adders | Drag Racing | Road Racing | Audio & Alarms | Show & Shine | Tech 
 

Reply
 
Old 05-01-2006   #1 (permalink)
crezykesser is offline Rookie

5.0L Member


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1 Threads: 1
 crezykesser's Country Flag
NY   New York
Default Supercharger or Blower?

i have a 1990 gt convertible with a GT 40 motor in it. I'm looking for the next step in horsepower. I want to add either a Supercharger or a Blower... what do you think? plus i would like to add more horsepower... any suggestions? Thanks
crezykesser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006   #2 (permalink)
GTRaptor is offline Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,629 Threads: 152
 GTRaptor's Country Flag  View GTRaptor's 605 photos  View GTRaptor's 69 products for your review  View GTRaptor's HomePage
Mexico City
Send a message via Yahoo to GTRaptor
Default Re: Supercharger or Blower?

Powerwise turbos have advantages, but the price is higher and installation is more complex. If you have the $ go with the turbo.
__________________
Rob Hernandez, AFM
GTRaptor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006   #3 (permalink)
fastpony89 is offline Apprentice


Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 69 Threads: 2
 fastpony89's Country Flag
Brandon   Florida
Default Re: Supercharger or Blower?

remember convertibles are heavy so first I would lose some weight...go with the vortech s trim with 8 psi because it is reliable...you don't want something that is going to break and cost you even more $ to fix....when I had my 99 GT conv I gained about 70 hp with that alone....better throttle body, h pipe, headers...cam, heads would be my suggestion
fastpony89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006   #4 (permalink)
05stangkidv6 is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1 Threads: 0
 05stangkidv6's Country Flag
Baltimore   Maryland
Default Re: Supercharger or Blower?

a supercharger and a blower are the same thing in a sence. there are 3 different types of superchargers 1-roots. which is the typical "blower" youre refering to 2-twin screw. which is somewhat like the roots only cutting up your hood is not necessary 3-centrifugal. which is the standard and all around best form of a supercharger around.

the roots supercharger or blower as its called adds a whole lot of unnecessary weight and gives power in scattered bursts rather than a coutinous stream of power
the twin screw is a lot like the roots because they both use meshing lobes. the twin screw is slightly better but still not as good as the next
the centrifugal supercharger is powered by a turbine and is the most efficient form of the superchargers and is probably your best bet considering how little work is involved in installation unless of course you like the look of that big ass blower sticking out of your hood which i must admit looks pretty mean

and as far as the turbo thing goes they give you about the same power as a supercharger but they are a real pain to instal due to having to rip up the exhaust system and can give you lag if you get one thats too big or not much of a boost at higher rpms if you get too small of one

hope that was a help
05stangkidv6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006   #5 (permalink)
STONECOLD is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,164 Threads: 45
 STONECOLD's Country Flag  View STONECOLD's 7 photos
N.Y.C.   New York
Send a message via AIM to STONECOLD
Default Re: Supercharger or Blower?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 05stangkidv6
a supercharger and a blower are the same thing in a sence. there are 3 different types of superchargers 1-roots. which is the typical "blower" youre refering to 2-twin screw. which is somewhat like the roots only cutting up your hood is not necessary 3-centrifugal. which is the standard and all around best form of a supercharger around.

the roots supercharger or blower as its called adds a whole lot of unnecessary weight and gives power in scattered bursts rather than a coutinous stream of power
the twin screw is a lot like the roots because they both use meshing lobes. the twin screw is slightly better but still not as good as the next
the centrifugal supercharger is powered by a turbine and is the most efficient form of the superchargers and is probably your best bet considering how little work is involved in installation unless of course you like the look of that big ass blower sticking out of your hood which i must admit looks pretty mean

and as far as the turbo thing goes they give you about the same power as a supercharger but they are a real pain to instal due to having to rip up the exhaust system and can give you lag if you get one thats too big or not much of a boost at higher rpms if you get too small of one

hope that was a help

The roots does not "give power in scattered bursts" its pretty linear and its in the low end of the rpm band. (The roots type blower is what you find in the 03/04) Cobra. The twin screw (Kenne Bell/Whipple) is more effecient, makes more hp at the same boost levels and basically delivers its power in the same way. (Low to mid rpms.) And neither one of these require that they stick through your roof. (Yes there are some huge roots blowers that would, but again look at the 03/04 Cobra's or any Kenne Bell, Saleen or Roush unit, they all fit under the hood, they just replace your current intake manifold.)

The centrifugal makes most of its power higher in the power band, its real push comes at red line because its dependent on the the motor to make its power. The faster the motor spins the more boost it makes. (The roots/twin screws arent rmp dependent.) And the centrifugal does not replace your intake manifold.

A turbo makes more power than any of the superchargers and generally makes more power than the SC at the same boost levels. But they cost more are harder to install and tune. And yes the bigger the turbo the more lag youll feel. But there are ways around that or least ways to lessen this. A twin turbo setup is one way. But thats another matter all together.
__________________
1995 Mustang GT 5.0
BBK CAI, Pro-M 75mm MAF, Pro-M Optimizer, BBK 70mm TB, GT-40 Intake, 24# Injectors, AFR 165's, 1.7 Roller rockers, Crane 2040 cam (E-303) BBK Equal Length headers, BBK O/R X-pipe, Flowmaster American Thunder 2 Chambers. FMS 3.73 Gears, Lentech AODE 2800 stall, BBK 255lph Fuel Pump, BBK Fuel Pressure Regulator. MSD 6AL, Steeda UDP's, FMS Aluminum drive shaft, Autologic chip Larocca tune.
STONECOLD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006   #6 (permalink)
FunkyBoss is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320 Threads: 72
 FunkyBoss's Country Flag  View FunkyBoss's 20 photos  View FunkyBoss's HomePage
Woodbridge   Virginia
Send a message via Yahoo to FunkyBoss
Default Re: Supercharger or Blower?

What are you goals for the car, street or strip? How much horsepower are you looking for? As mentioned above, positive displacement blowers (roots, twin screw) give you power down low which makes for one hell of a fun street car. Centrifugal blowers (vortec, procharger, paxton) produces boost in the higher rpms and have alittle more HP potential. I personally would do a turbo setup before centrifugal SC on a foxbody. Both have the so-called lag, but turbos are much more efficiant. If all goes as planned, I will be ordering my Kenne Bell for the 02, maybe as soon as next week. If not I will be spraying the juice.
FunkyBoss is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2006   #7 (permalink)
ItsaV6iswear! is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 201 Threads: 48
 ItsaV6iswear!'s Country Flag
Birmingham   Alabama
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastpony89
remember convertibles are heavy so first I would lose some weight...go with the vortech s trim with 8 psi because it is reliable...you don't want something that is going to break and cost you even more $ to fix....when I had my 99 GT conv I gained about 70 hp with that alone....better throttle body, h pipe, headers...cam, heads would be my suggestion
how much was the vortech s trim?
__________________
2000 Mustang GT Automatic underdrive pulleys, frpp 4.10's, J-mod'd, moser 31 splines, 3inch arp's all around, sct tune, 150 NX

Message me about Nitrous Express kits, please pm or email to n2o_seller@hotmail.com i will beat any buisinesses advertised price
ItsaV6iswear! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2006   #8 (permalink)
FordTrucksForMe is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 39 Threads: 6
 FordTrucksForMe's Country Flag
Dallas   Texas
Default

I concur with those that say turbos are best if you can afford it. They can get pretty spendy. I put a Garrett twin turbo set up on the wifes Excursion. Water cooled and everything. By the time I got done with the transmission reinforcements, computer reprograming, 5 inch exhaust, and all the other junk that goes along with it I dropped $12,000. That's with me doing the install. $12K in parts but that truck will fly now. For the 91 convertible we're going the supercharged route. Quite frankly, because it's cheaper.
FordTrucksForMe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2006   #9 (permalink)
blueoval is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 771 Threads: 25
 blueoval's Country Flag  View blueoval's 16 photos  View blueoval's HomePage
Delano   Tennessee
Default

If money is going to be an issue then go centrifugal. A procharger is more than 2000 cheaper than a Kenne Bell. And a turbo is about the same as the KB but will cost a lot more to install and get in working order. What are your horsepower goals. If the goals aren't to high I would just go with nitrous.
__________________
1998 GT Saleen replica
New forged internals w/cobra crank, TEA CNC ported heads w/ comp cams XE270AH, AccuFab throttlebody and plenum, Spec III clutch, TKO 600 trans, aluminum drive shaft, 3:73 gears, BBK long tube headers, 255lpm intank fuel pump, Dyno tuned, Polished Procharger D-1sc 12psi, 3 core intercooler. SVO hood and 18in Budnik wheels w/toyo tires. Caster/Camber plates BBK lowering springs. Car web page
Comp cams XE262AH,T-45 with tri-ax shifter for sale
blueoval is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbo vs. Supercharger Power Adders 144 1 Week Ago 05:58 AM
Eaton M90 Blower on a 2000 Mustang MustangGuyChuck V6 Tech 16 03-28-2008 03:04 AM
S197 Mustang GT... Will a supercharger damage my engine?? odingalt 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 38 10-08-2007 11:55 AM
supercharger n stuff raklor V6 Tech 5 10-11-2005 10:40 AM
Need Guidance From You Experts (Paxton Supercharger) cfiiman Power Adders 3 08-29-2005 12:23 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112