'87 Fox Road Racer I have raced Fox chassis in SCCA ITB for many years. The best, least expensive set up would look something like this.
GT sway bars, cut down stock springs (optional to use GT springs, depending on track surface), Sensitrack struts (Monroe), hard durometer bushings in the front A arms, home-made K member lower brace, brake ducting to front calipers, steel braided flex brake lines, 3.45:1 differential gears, with welded differential. We preferred to use 14X6 steel wheels, with lots of offset. A better idea is 13X6 wheels (very light), with offset that will clear the brake rotors. I am a believer in low rotational mass concepts.
Linkage in the rear is the secret of Fox (M3), and M4 chassis' handling. Many add-on pieces exist to cure the inherent ills of the four link designs, but there are other things that can be done, especially for the budget minded. Understanding of the actual problem is needed, first. Best reference is the Mathias book on Mustang...the second one deals with chassis, and solutions for various types of applications (street, drag, road racing, etc). A must read, in my opinion. However...
The essence of the "handling problems in the rear of the Fox" is this: A four link suspension that has to locate both laterally and longitudinally uses arms that are not in the same plane. Both uppers and lowers are set in rubber, and when the car is cornering that rubber is forced into angles not consistant with the opposing arms. Therefore, it creats a progressive spring rate (rubber is a spring, here) that approaches infinity (engineering term meaning higher, and higher rates). In the rear, when the spring rate approaches infinity, the car will oversteer. It happens quickly in the Fox, and is frequently referred to as "snap oversteer". Above is the problem, below is only one of the many solutions.
In the rear we initially used replacement medium durometer bushings on the upper arm rear bushings, with new upper arms from Racer Walsh. For a race/track car, a better solution is the upper arm rear bushing replacement from Walsh, with spherical bearings (fits the large cast eye on the differential housing). A better solution (more money, tho) is to use complete upper adjustable arm with spherical bearings in front, and then use Walsh rear spherical bearing replacements in the rear. Note: these upper arms may be questionably legal in IT.
I do have positive feelings for them relative to legality, and I can make arguments for legality. Not all will agree, however, so I won't discuss that here. You decide after reading the rules yourself.
These will not change the basic geometry (which is not the basic problem), but will attack the snap oversteer problem.
Incidentally, the 7.5 rear works very well in IT. (Also, the 8.8 is ILLEGAL in IT...car was never produced with it, and you are not allowed to create a new model.)
I hope this gives you some insight. Powertrain ideas were not included, but I can share them also if you are interested.
Good racing.
Bill |