I don't see the benefit or purpose of a picture signature but nothing wrong with having one either. They just take up a ton of space, they cause posts to get jumbled up visually, and what's the point of one?
__________________
MOOG Certified Tech. For mods and sound clips, see profile and gallery.
Ask me why I ran "only" a 13.54.
Member: NMRA Member: White Mustang Registry #362 Member: Fuzzy Dicer
I think Signatures is a great idea, most forums have them, just make them small, on all of the other mustang forums i am a member of they allow signatures, i think it adds a cool option for members to have. I they dont like them they dont have to have them.
And usually an option to turn off sigs if you don't want to view them personally, or to only view on the 1st post of the thread.
i mean no disrespect stoenr, but if you log onto the collective for example, it grows real old real fast scrolling through posts with a huge pic on every post. it makes the threads harder to read through, and really, if i want to check out someones car i`ll log into the profile gallery. i really dont care to see the same pic of someones car, or worse just some junk pic that someone thinks is cool like 50 times in a thread. i dont think its a good idea at all. jmo
__________________
goina hundred in a 55, and i dont know why..
some things were just meant to be..
05 V6 auto, torch red, basic,:cool: a few mods
06 V6 stick, vista, premium (g/f`s car)
