That would make it worse, in my opinion. My understanding is when using the dual intake port design (one rectangle and one round port on each cylinder), you should stay away from aggressive intake porting. The intake side suffers from too much volume and not enough velocity. If you make the tunnel bigger, you'll amplify the short comings of the design. Matching the ports on the intake manifold->imrc->head might be enough.
Of course, this is an over simplified analysis. Your application may warrant more port work on the intake side.
What are your plans for the engine? blower?
BTW, the rectangle ports are the primary ports. The little notch in the port is where the fuel injector sits. As you can see, the fuel is being sprayed into the primary port ONLY. When you hit 3250 rpms, the intake manifold runner control will open the secondary ports (the oval ports) to allow more air in (I believe the injectors have a longer duration at that point to increase the fuel to match air increase). |