AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang > V6 Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 01-14-2009   #1 (permalink)
bobthebrat is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14 Threads: 3
 bobthebrat's Country Flag
Saskatoon   Saskatchewan
Default 86 3.8 upgrades for hp?

Just picked up a 86 Convertable, it is a 3.8 V6 auto.
Since I'll be keeping this one I would like to build up the engine, but I'm not sure what to do to it.
I dont know much about the 3.8's, so I don't know what can be done to them.
Do the superchargers from the thunderbirds fit?
What could I do?
__________________
1986 Mustang LX Hatchback 3.8 - Sold
1986 Mustang LX Convertible 3.8 - Daily driver
1982 Mustang GLX Notchback 3.3 - Being rebuilt
1989 Mustang LX Notchback 2.3 - New toy
bobthebrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009   #2 (permalink)
Tim'91_5.0_304 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 17 Threads: 2
 Tim'91_5.0_304's Country Flag
Perdido   Alabama
Default

ummm u could put some new ecu comps (stages 1-3) really do what ever u want to check out Car Accessories Truck Accessories Air Suspension Performance Parts Chips u can find some real good performance parts for it
Tim'91_5.0_304 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009   #3 (permalink)
Tim'91_5.0_304 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 17 Threads: 2
 Tim'91_5.0_304's Country Flag
Perdido   Alabama
Default

i would say put a high performance clutch but its an automatic...im more of the 5speed type i hate automatics sorry but check the link and find what u need and idk if that superchrger would fit but if u have 1 try it
Tim'91_5.0_304 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009   #4 (permalink)
StalkerStang is offline Made Member

V6 Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,750 Threads: 30
 StalkerStang's Country Flag  View StalkerStang's 13 photos  View StalkerStang's 13 products for your review  View StalkerStang's HomePage
Surprise   Arizona
Send a message via Yahoo to StalkerStang
Default

Probably not what you want to hear, but for the money, your best bet for performance is to to a 5.0 conversion. Many many more options after that!
__________________
Jesse Berger
90 LX, Previous 4 cyl. (Decommissioned, 351W on the way)
H/C/I+Bolt Ons
Best ET: 12.54@106 mph

2001 V6 5 Speed Daily Driver
Windstar Intake, Dual Exhuast, CAI, Headers
Best ET: 15.6@88 mph (stock trim)
StalkerStang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #5 (permalink)
vortech96 is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 1
 vortech96's Country Flag
Lubbock   Texas
Default

yea i would agree with StalkerStang. . 5.0 would be a easy swap to do. more options for power, and do a 5 speed swap to.
vortech96 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #6 (permalink)
bobthebrat is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14 Threads: 3
 bobthebrat's Country Flag
Saskatoon   Saskatchewan
Default

I already have the 5L crossmember, springs, diff, and everything (all not put in). But for some reason I want to keep the 6, it will mainly be a cruising vehicle, so I don't think a 8 would be the best things for me. I enjoyed my last mustang (same engine, and tranny), it had good pep, and could break some nice doughnuts with the all-seasons on. I would just like to get some more power to up the fun level.
__________________
1986 Mustang LX Hatchback 3.8 - Sold
1986 Mustang LX Convertible 3.8 - Daily driver
1982 Mustang GLX Notchback 3.3 - Being rebuilt
1989 Mustang LX Notchback 2.3 - New toy
bobthebrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #7 (permalink)
StalkerStang is offline Made Member

V6 Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,750 Threads: 30
 StalkerStang's Country Flag  View StalkerStang's 13 photos  View StalkerStang's 13 products for your review  View StalkerStang's HomePage
Surprise   Arizona
Send a message via Yahoo to StalkerStang
Default

Not trying to ruin your fun or anything, keep the V6 if thats what you want, but that year V6, versus a EFI mass-air 5.0L is hands down the 5.0, more power, cheaper to build, runs smoother (as long as it has a stock or close to stock cam in it), and more than likely be more reliable and get better gas mileage.

If you do keep the V6 though, I would see about converting it to a single-port or even a split port style EFI set-up from the 94 and newer stangs. The single port cars make anywhere between 140-150 HP stock, not as much as the split port cars which are 190-193 HP stock, but some guys have tricks to get the single port cars running very strong from what I've heard.

I know shiner probably has more insight on this as well if he's listening?
__________________
Jesse Berger
90 LX, Previous 4 cyl. (Decommissioned, 351W on the way)
H/C/I+Bolt Ons
Best ET: 12.54@106 mph

2001 V6 5 Speed Daily Driver
Windstar Intake, Dual Exhuast, CAI, Headers
Best ET: 15.6@88 mph (stock trim)
StalkerStang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #8 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,225 Threads: 65
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 16 photos
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StalkerStang View Post
Not trying to ruin your fun or anything, keep the V6 if thats what you want, but that year V6, versus a EFI mass-air 5.0L is hands down the 5.0, more power, cheaper to build, runs smoother (as long as it has a stock or close to stock cam in it), and more than likely be more reliable and get better gas mileage.

If you do keep the V6 though, I would see about converting it to a single-port or even a split port style EFI set-up from the 94 and newer stangs. The single port cars make anywhere between 140-150 HP stock, not as much as the split port cars which are 190-193 HP stock, but some guys have tricks to get the single port cars running very strong from what I've heard.

I know shiner probably has more insight on this as well if he's listening?
Funny that you mentioned me, Jesse. I know nothing about his year V6. That's why I didn't reply.

Now if he wanted to go with a newer swap, that's a different story......
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52 Conservative 597rwhp
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88

GSS Motorsports
V6 and V8 Performance
270-405-1139
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #9 (permalink)
StalkerStang is offline Made Member

V6 Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,750 Threads: 30
 StalkerStang's Country Flag  View StalkerStang's 13 photos  View StalkerStang's 13 products for your review  View StalkerStang's HomePage
Surprise   Arizona
Send a message via Yahoo to StalkerStang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerstang View Post
Now if he wanted to go with a newer swap, that's a different story......
Exactly why I mentioned you!
__________________
Jesse Berger
90 LX, Previous 4 cyl. (Decommissioned, 351W on the way)
H/C/I+Bolt Ons
Best ET: 12.54@106 mph

2001 V6 5 Speed Daily Driver
Windstar Intake, Dual Exhuast, CAI, Headers
Best ET: 15.6@88 mph (stock trim)
StalkerStang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3.8, what years have same block? edb2007 V6 Tech 41 1 Day Ago 09:20 PM
1994 mustang 3.8 upgrades rebelredneck V6 Tech 9 03-25-2008 11:31 PM
Will a 4.6 intake spacer fit a 3.8 Mustang? v6stng24 V6 Tech 7 12-17-2007 01:44 AM
3.8 5.0 swap question must-be-ford V6 Talk 3 04-07-2007 10:21 AM
Performance Upgrades for my 1998 3.8 Liter V6 Stang Sonic 7412 V6 Talk 8 07-09-2006 04:59 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112