AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang > V6 Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #1 (permalink)
37mm is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 117 Threads: 34
 37mm's Country Flag  View 37mm's 18 photos
University Place   Washington
Question Here it is again: Should I keep my 3.55's or go with 3.73's?

I understand this is a highly debated and old argument within the Mustang world.

In a couple weeks, I'm getting my 02' 7.5 swapped out for a 8.8 from a 04' Mach 1. It comes with the stock 3.55. But I was wondering if I should upgrade them to 3.73s.

I've done at least a little research on the pros and cons between the 3.55's and 3.73's on my end.

From what I've gathered: (excuse me from my lack of knowledge, I'm still learning which is why I brought this up to you guys)

3.55's are good for the daily driver and a little mpg friendly. Top end friendly.

3.73's have a very noticeable boost in acceleration, but effect your MPG. You'll also sacrifice some top end speed.

My questions are:
Regardless of which ratio I go with, even with the 3.55's will there still be a noticeable difference from stock? I'm assuming the combination of gears and a T-lock will still put a dumb smile on my face.

My driving habits:
The majority of my driving is within the city. But I at least drive down the highway to visit friends and fam at least once or twice a month. The round trip is around 200 miles on a 60-70mph speed zone.

I'm not much of an aggressive driver, but I wouldn't mind an extra kick in my daily driver.

There are LOTS of ricers in my town. And I'd like at least some leverage against the never ending onslaughts of fart-cannon-fly by's.

Another factor:
My folks are about to move down to California and I'll be residing in Washington State still for school. I'm not sure how many times I'll be visiting them down there, but I think this should be a factor on my decision also.

Will the mpg change be major with the 3.73's? What are you guy's getting in your Mustangs? City/HWY? (average)

What's your guy's thoughts?

Keep the 3.55's? Or screw it! Go with 3.73's. I'd like VALID thorough reasons based upon your opinions. Not just: "Go with 3.73" one liners.

Thanks!
__________________
Modifications:
Internal Hamster Chamber Block Powered by 6 Teddy Bear Hamsters. Stand alone Rat Wheel Spooled InterKoolaid Twin Turbo System. 2 X NOS Stickers that add 20WHP each. Dual Folger's Coffee Can Exhaust upgrade. Wal*Mart Spinner hubs.
Future Modifications: Direct Mentos Diet Coke Injection System. And some cheetos. (actually, the cheetos aren't for the car, they just sounded good.)

Last edited by 37mm; 2 Weeks Ago at 09:31 PM. Reason: I meant 3.73 in the title, instead of 3.77
37mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #2 (permalink)
Dave is offline Made Member

S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 921 Threads: 10
 Dave's Country Flag  View Dave's 6 photos
Amherst   Wisconsin
Default

What is your gear ratio now? Any idea of rpm at 70 mph?

Just guess for now I'd stick with the 3.55's in the new rear and see how you like them.
Dave
__________________
427R Roush-with Roush 540 motor,2300 TVS
'66' Ranchero w/almost done 302 T-5 swap
2005 4x4 Ranger
2001 Ranger Edge
'69' Fairlane Cobra, 428 4-speed waiting for work
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #3 (permalink)
37mm is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 117 Threads: 34
 37mm's Country Flag  View 37mm's 18 photos
University Place   Washington
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
What is your gear ratio now? Any idea of rpm at 70 mph?

Just guess for now I'd stick with the 3.55's in the new rear and see how you like them.
Dave
Hey Dave.

I'm currently running the stock gear ratio my 02' V6 came out with. I bought the 8.8, since it came with both the T-lock and 3.55's off the bat. I was tired of the one wheel hop and wanted the two wheel peel.

RPM-wise at 70-75, I drive like a granny and like to keep things quiet and cruising on the highway usually. I don't know the exact range. I'm thinking between 2500-3000? If that sounds lame, like I said, I'm not sure exactly. Lol.
__________________
Modifications:
Internal Hamster Chamber Block Powered by 6 Teddy Bear Hamsters. Stand alone Rat Wheel Spooled InterKoolaid Twin Turbo System. 2 X NOS Stickers that add 20WHP each. Dual Folger's Coffee Can Exhaust upgrade. Wal*Mart Spinner hubs.
Future Modifications: Direct Mentos Diet Coke Injection System. And some cheetos. (actually, the cheetos aren't for the car, they just sounded good.)
37mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #4 (permalink)
Dave is offline Made Member

S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 921 Threads: 10
 Dave's Country Flag  View Dave's 6 photos
Amherst   Wisconsin
Default

I'm some on here would sure know what the stock rear ratio is. There should be a small metal tag attached to one of the bolts on the rear end cover that looks like this. It has the ratio info on it, that and tire size will give what your rpm's are.
Dave
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech...es/AxleTag.gif
__________________
427R Roush-with Roush 540 motor,2300 TVS
'66' Ranchero w/almost done 302 T-5 swap
2005 4x4 Ranger
2001 Ranger Edge
'69' Fairlane Cobra, 428 4-speed waiting for work
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #5 (permalink)
Dave is offline Made Member

S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 921 Threads: 10
 Dave's Country Flag  View Dave's 6 photos
Amherst   Wisconsin
Default

Double post for some reason!
__________________
427R Roush-with Roush 540 motor,2300 TVS
'66' Ranchero w/almost done 302 T-5 swap
2005 4x4 Ranger
2001 Ranger Edge
'69' Fairlane Cobra, 428 4-speed waiting for work
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #6 (permalink)
Playboiplay is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 305 Threads: 5
 Playboiplay's Country Flag  View Playboiplay's 15 photos  View Playboiplay's HomePage
Sacramento   California
Send a message via AIM to Playboiplay Send a message via Yahoo to Playboiplay
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
What is your gear ratio now? Any idea of rpm at 70 mph?

Just guess for now I'd stick with the 3.55's in the new rear and see how you like them.
Dave
A stock mustang should be running 3.27s

I'd recommend trying out the 3.55 gears for about a month to get a feel of the difference over stock. If you like them, stick with em. However, if the mod bug bites you (...and I'm sure it will), consider going up to 3.73 or possibly 3.90 since you'll have an 8.8 rear end. One BIG upside of having a GT or incorporating GT parts is that there's a much larger selection of aftermarket parts available for them. Hopefully they'll show more love for the V6 in the future.
__________________
Sexy Noir

LUCILLE: Noir 2000 5spd V6 Convertible / Roush Stage 1 body kit & dual Magnaflow side exhaust + X-Pipe / Roush lowering Springs / Roush Light Bar / Roush White Performance Guages / Roush Billet Pedals / Cloth rag-top (who needs vinyl...) / Saleen Speedster Tonneau / Billet interior / BBK CAI / Zenetti Stella Wheels 20x9.5 (Front) 20x10 (Rear) / Cobra-R Wheels 17x9 (Front) 17x10 (Rear)* [in the garage]
Playboiplay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #7 (permalink)
37mm is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 117 Threads: 34
 37mm's Country Flag  View 37mm's 18 photos
University Place   Washington
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Playboiplay View Post
A stock mustang should be running 3.27s

I'd recommend trying out the 3.55 gears for about a month to get a feel of the difference over stock. If you like them, stick with em. However, if the mod bug bites you (...and I'm sure it will), consider going up to 3.73 or possibly 3.90 since you'll have an 8.8 rear end. One BIG upside of having a GT or incorporating GT parts is that there's a much larger selection of aftermarket parts available for them. Hopefully they'll show more love for the V6 in the future.
The original plan was to try the 3.55's to see if I liked them. And believe me, if the mod bug didn't bite me, I wouldn't be spending a pretty penny on a new 8.8 rear end! Which is why I was wondering about the 3.73's. This debate has been running in my head for weeks and was only fueled by it by other posts relating to it.

I know for sure when the 2011 V6 Mustang Rolls out with it's supposed 315HP V6. The market is gonna be big. And that's when I'll know for sure my sixer is outdated.
__________________
Modifications:
Internal Hamster Chamber Block Powered by 6 Teddy Bear Hamsters. Stand alone Rat Wheel Spooled InterKoolaid Twin Turbo System. 2 X NOS Stickers that add 20WHP each. Dual Folger's Coffee Can Exhaust upgrade. Wal*Mart Spinner hubs.
Future Modifications: Direct Mentos Diet Coke Injection System. And some cheetos. (actually, the cheetos aren't for the car, they just sounded good.)
37mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #8 (permalink)
Cusp is offline Made Member

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 438 Threads: 16
 Cusp's Country Flag  View Cusp's 3 photos
Santa Barbara   California
Default

The difference between 3.55 and 3.73 is only about 5%. A small change. Looking at the T5 transmission, it appears that the V6 with 3.55s will be similar to the GTs with 3.73s.

As far as top end speed if you have the horsepower to push the air....

Try the 3.55s you can always change them later.
__________________
2008 manual GT with deluxe trim, FRPP CAI, FRPP GTB Mufflers & 91 Tillman Tune. 3.73 gears, Coast Ultralight Drive-shaft. 18" OEM Polished Bullitts, Webelectric Sequentials, XM built into the Shaker 500. Alarm and Escort 8500.
Cusp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #9 (permalink)
37mm is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 117 Threads: 34
 37mm's Country Flag  View 37mm's 18 photos
University Place   Washington
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cusp View Post
The difference between 3.55 and 3.73 is only about 5%. A small change. Looking at the T5 transmission, it appears that the V6 with 3.55s will be similar to the GTs with 3.73s.

As far as top end speed if you have the horsepower to push the air....

Try the 3.55s you can always change them later.
That's what I've been reading from other posts relating to this topic. The differences RPM wise between the 3.55's and 3.73's from what I read were I believe around 300 RPMs. Which didn't seem like a very dramatic difference.

I think I'll try them out and see what happens.
__________________
Modifications:
Internal Hamster Chamber Block Powered by 6 Teddy Bear Hamsters. Stand alone Rat Wheel Spooled InterKoolaid Twin Turbo System. 2 X NOS Stickers that add 20WHP each. Dual Folger's Coffee Can Exhaust upgrade. Wal*Mart Spinner hubs.
Future Modifications: Direct Mentos Diet Coke Injection System. And some cheetos. (actually, the cheetos aren't for the car, they just sounded good.)
37mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #10 (permalink)
2Manystangs is online now Made Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,233 Threads: 9
 2Manystangs's Country Flag
Tampa   Florida
Default

Go with the lower gears (3.73) if it's too much you can always put larger rims/tires on it to raise the effective gear ratio...
__________________
"Goose, Hollywood's fine, I want Viper"

1995 Mustang GT Cnv 347(427 stroker being built!) almost done!
1996 Cobra with Kenne Bell 2.1 Supercharger and every other conceivable part you can bolt on it...650hp upgrade in the works
2003 Infiniti M45 V8 340 hp...a methadone treatment for reformed Mustang drivers
2Manystangs is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #11 (permalink)
37mm is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 117 Threads: 34
 37mm's Country Flag  View 37mm's 18 photos
University Place   Washington
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Manystangs View Post
Go with the lower gears (3.73) if it's too much you can always put larger rims/tires on it to raise the effective gear ratio...
I've been hearing about how larger wheel/tire size(s) effect the gear ratio. But I have little knowledge of the pros and cons of them.

I'm currently riding on 17x9's (245/45/95W) Would that be sufficient for what you were talking about?

Can you give me a little input on how 3.73's or pretty much how gear ratios are effected by wheel/tire size?
__________________
Modifications:
Internal Hamster Chamber Block Powered by 6 Teddy Bear Hamsters. Stand alone Rat Wheel Spooled InterKoolaid Twin Turbo System. 2 X NOS Stickers that add 20WHP each. Dual Folger's Coffee Can Exhaust upgrade. Wal*Mart Spinner hubs.
Future Modifications: Direct Mentos Diet Coke Injection System. And some cheetos. (actually, the cheetos aren't for the car, they just sounded good.)

Last edited by 37mm; 2 Weeks Ago at 03:36 PM. Reason: ...
37mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #12 (permalink)
Cusp is offline Made Member

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 438 Threads: 16
 Cusp's Country Flag  View Cusp's 3 photos
Santa Barbara   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 37mm View Post
I've been hearing about how larger wheel/tire size(s) effect the gear ratio. But I have little knowledge of the pros and cons of them.

I'm currently riding on 17x9's (245/45/95W) Would that be sufficient for what you were talking about?

Can you give me a little input on how 3.73's or pretty much how gear ratios are effected by wheel/tire size?
The ratios of the gears are not effected by tire size.

The drive train functions as a whole to change angular velocity to linear velocity. The final "gear" in the train is the tires. Something like this.

Engine RPM X Transmission Ratio X Rear End ratio gives your axle RPM. Axle RPM X wheel circumference = distance per revolution per minute. Times 60 minutes to get hours.

The end game is how many times does the engine go around for a given distance traveled.
__________________
2008 manual GT with deluxe trim, FRPP CAI, FRPP GTB Mufflers & 91 Tillman Tune. 3.73 gears, Coast Ultralight Drive-shaft. 18" OEM Polished Bullitts, Webelectric Sequentials, XM built into the Shaker 500. Alarm and Escort 8500.
Cusp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 6 Days Ago   #13 (permalink)
wrenchman is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 163 Threads: 32
 wrenchman's Country Flag
Logansport   Indiana
Send a message via Yahoo to wrenchman
Default

Here's the basic formulas I use to make gearing calculations, and they've proven to be pretty accurate (providing you're plugging accurate numbers into them):

MPH= (RPM x Tire diameter x 3) divided by (trans gear ratio x diff gear ratio)

RPM= (MPH x trans gear ratio x diff gear ratio) divided by (tire diameter x 3)

Gear Ratio= (RPM x Tire diameter x 3) divided by (MPH)
(this gives the final ratio which is a combination of trans gear and diff gear)

Tire Diameter= (MPH x trans gear ratio x diff gear ratio) divided by (RPM x 3)

Using these formulas I actually calculated and made up a chart for myself showing the engine rpm at different road speeds in different gears (T5 trans) with four different diff gears. The calculated numbers were pretty much dead on with my tach and speedo readings on my current setup. Might be worth doing the math to actually get an accurate idea of what you could wind up with.
__________________
I thought I wanted a career....turns out I just wanted a paycheck!

'70 Mach I
'95 Mustang coupe
'90 F150
'79 Mustang Mini-Stock
wrenchman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 6 Days Ago   #14 (permalink)
ESG-642T is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 957 Threads: 3
 ESG-642T's Country Flag  View ESG-642T's HomePage
college station   Texas
Send a message via AIM to ESG-642T
Default

3.73s or 4.10s

.....If your not planning on going turbo I would say 3.73 at the least.
__________________
ESG-642t:
Block .20 Bore 3.830, ARP Head Studs, Ford Girdle, Scat 4340 Forged 6.125" H-Beam with Ross Forged Dished Pistons 8:7:1 compression, KPP Cam Reground 224* .587" Intake / 222* .567" Exhaust 114 LCA, 110 IC, Self Ported Heads with Self Ported Upper intake ported lower intake with a matching ported throttle, Mac long tube headers, Flow master 40 series mufflers, 3.73 motive gears, Eaton posi trac, Sct livewire, Bilstien shocks and struts, Eibach pro kit springs.
ESG-642T is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 5 Days Ago   #15 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,208 Threads: 65
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 16 photos
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

If you are at 3:55's now, it will not be a huge jump going to 3:73's. I would say to stick with what you have, and save the cash for another mod. The price of the gears + installation is not cheap.....
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52 Conservative 597rwhp
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88

GSS Motorsports
V6 and V8 Performance
270-405-1139
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110