AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang > V6 Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Closed Thread
 
Old 06-02-2005   #16 (permalink)
nadmaster is offline Rookie


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 21 Threads: 5
Lawton, Oklahoma
Default

Ok, I love my 6er first of all and im not hating on the v8s cuz i love them just as much, but if i can take a 6, slap a 3300 dollar supercharger on it make better gas millage and pay less for insurance a month and still pay less in total for the car and the mods and make just as much if not more than a stock GT i would. Now on the other hand if i was looking to make 700 horse i would have bought a GT and blown the crap out of it. its all in how you look at it. what your personal preference is. I am also building my car up because i don't like the v6 bashers, especially the stock ones. no offence to anyone but if i can humiliate a basher on the road, infront of 100's of people with my v6 its sooooo much fun.
nadmaster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-03-2005   #17 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nadmaster
Ok, I love my 6er first of all and im not hating on the v8s cuz i love them just as much, but if i can take a 6, slap a 3300 dollar supercharger on it make better gas millage and pay less for insurance a month and still pay less in total for the car and the mods and make just as much if not more than a stock GT i would. Now on the other hand if i was looking to make 700 horse i would have bought a GT and blown the crap out of it. its all in how you look at it. what your personal preference is. I am also building my car up because i don't like the v6 bashers, especially the stock ones. no offence to anyone but if i can humiliate a basher on the road, infront of 100's of people with my v6 its sooooo much fun.
yep! I love beating GTs, Crossfires, and Hondas in my 6, almost as much as I loved beating Chevelles and Corvettes in my 68!
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-03-2005   #18 (permalink)
ran260gt is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,187 Threads: 37
 ran260gt's Country Flag
Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kscoyote
yep! I love beating GTs, Crossfires, and Hondas in my 6, !
I would like to know your 1/4 times

I had a 02 V6 auto stang , and it was 16sec slow!
I have a friend with a procharger stage 2 on his 03 V6 5 speed ,
and his best et`s are 14.2-14.4 , he doesn`t beat that many 99-04 GT`s and thats with a blower!

I just can`t see you beating GT`s with the modifictions you have!
ran260gt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #19 (permalink)
Pinto is offline Apprentice

V6 Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 202 Threads: 5
 Pinto's Country Flag  View Pinto's 7 photos
Longmont   Colorado
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ran260gt
I would like to know your 1/4 times

I had a 02 V6 auto stang , and it was 16sec slow!
I have a friend with a procharger stage 2 on his 03 V6 5 speed ,
and his best et`s are 14.2-14.4 , he doesn`t beat that many 99-04 GT`s and thats with a blower!

I just can`t see you beating GT`s with the modifictions you have!
the 3.8 get's better response from turboes than superchargers. Nitrous works pretty well on them too. The supercharged v6's just don't perform (from the ones that I have seen) like the nitrous and turbo guys.
__________________
1998 V6- 12.9@106
1994 GT- N2O'd
V6 mods- Too many to list
GT mods- now running nitrous
Pinto is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #20 (permalink)
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline Senior Member

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,386 Threads: 123
 Mustangdewd3.8's Country Flag  View Mustangdewd3.8's 27 photos  View Mustangdewd3.8's HomePage
Media   Pennsylvania
Send a message via AIM to Mustangdewd3.8
Default

Superchargers would work better on high rpms engines liek 4 cyls.

Turbos would be nice on a v6- perhaps your friend doesn't know how to drive or tuned it right

Or maybe KS runs into some bad GT drivers.

But I've seen v6s run 15's stock. and it's not what ya do, it's the compliments that you do with what you do, you follow stradegy where all mods benefit from each other, you'd be surpirsed where it gets ya

A tired 99 GT will prolly run a 14.5-14.9 1/4 mile under a good driver.

even 2004s only ran like 14.3 or more. - I mean with KS mods he could defeintly come near cutting a second off his time, running into a bad driver or grabbing a good launch can throw a v6 his edge
__________________
1994 Mustang 3.8 "Hidalgo"
2007 Mustang 4.0 "Blue"
2010 Mustang GT 4.6 "Jessica"
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #21 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ran260gt
I would like to know your 1/4 times

I had a 02 V6 auto stang , and it was 16sec slow!
I have a friend with a procharger stage 2 on his 03 V6 5 speed ,
and his best et`s are 14.2-14.4 , he doesn`t beat that many 99-04 GT`s and thats with a blower!

I just can`t see you beating GT`s with the modifictions you have!
depends on the GT.

Auto 4speed GTs pre 94 are ripe for picking, and the 94-98 GTs are also good picks to take.

the 94-98 GTs weigh between 3300-3400 lbs, and have 215-225 hp. I'm putting out the same hp, but my car weighs 3059 lbs.
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #22 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustangdewd3.8
Superchargers would work better on high rpms engines liek 4 cyls.

Turbos would be nice on a v6- perhaps your friend doesn't know how to drive or tuned it right

Or maybe KS runs into some bad GT drivers.

But I've seen v6s run 15's stock. and it's not what ya do, it's the compliments that you do with what you do, you follow stradegy where all mods benefit from each other, you'd be surpirsed where it gets ya

A tired 99 GT will prolly run a 14.5-14.9 1/4 mile under a good driver.

even 2004s only ran like 14.3 or more. - I mean with KS mods he could defeintly come near cutting a second off his time, running into a bad driver or grabbing a good launch can throw a v6 his edge
I don't mess with 99+ GTs. I'd need around 50 more hp, and a revised top end to make it a drivers race.

just the pre-99s with chips on their shoulders.

Besides, most of 'em lift when they shift! kinda evens out the whole manual/auto thing.. . All the potential in the world deosn't matter if you don't take advantage of it!
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #23 (permalink)
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline Senior Member

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,386 Threads: 123
 Mustangdewd3.8's Country Flag  View Mustangdewd3.8's 27 photos  View Mustangdewd3.8's HomePage
Media   Pennsylvania
Send a message via AIM to Mustangdewd3.8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kscoyote
depends on the GT.

Auto 4speed GTs pre 94 are ripe for picking, and the 94-98 GTs are also good picks to take.

the 94-98 GTs weigh between 3300-3400 lbs, and have 215-225 hp. I'm putting out the same hp, but my car weighs 3059 lbs.
but don't they put out like 60-80 more lbs ft torque?
__________________
1994 Mustang 3.8 "Hidalgo"
2007 Mustang 4.0 "Blue"
2010 Mustang GT 4.6 "Jessica"
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #24 (permalink)
rcviper25 is offline Rookie


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 46 Threads: 18
Ft. Worth, Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kscoyote
Perhaps, if you'd bought a 6, you'd have extra money in your pocket for aftermarket products.
Sorry, just got back from Mexico... anyways, this isn't the case for me. I understand what your saying though. In my case, my grandfather was buying the car for me (he's a car dealer so we get pretty good deals). He told me he was willing to spend 13,000 for a car the would get me to and from college without problems (meaning he wanted one with low miles). We found an 01 GT that's loaded for 14,000 so he jumped on it. It's not like I had the option of spending less on the car and more on the aftermarket.... But to respond to what you suggested. This is just my opinion... but why not wait a little while, maybe a year or two when the price of a v8 car is around the same as the v6 your thinking about buying now... then, you will have more power to work with when you get the car? Like I said, this is just my opinion. I'm fixing to buy an exaust system, 3.73 gears and maybe a few other things... with this, I'll have all the power I need.
rcviper25 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-04-2005   #25 (permalink)
Jairazona is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 486 Threads: 9
 Jairazona's Country Flag  View Jairazona's 279 photos
Orange County   New York
Send a message via MSN to Jairazona
Default

well if you want a cheap fixer upper heres a website

http://www.erepairables.com/search/b...ang/index.html
__________________
03 GT Ragtop
Mach 1000
Interior Upgrade
17" 5-Spoke Bright Wheels
SLP exhaust, H pipe, 3.73's
Kenne Bell twin screw sc...etc.etc.etc
Borrow money from a pessimist, they don't expect it back.
Jairazona is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-05-2005   #26 (permalink)
Glowmunkey is offline Apprentice


Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 154 Threads: 5
 Glowmunkey's Country Flag  View Glowmunkey's 13 photos  View Glowmunkey's HomePage
Albany   New York
Send a message via AIM to Glowmunkey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustangdewd3.8

A tired 99 GT will prolly run a 14.5-14.9 1/4 mile under a good driver.

even 2004s only ran like 14.3 or more. - I mean with KS mods he could defeintly come near cutting a second off his time, running into a bad driver or grabbing a good launch can throw a v6 his edge
I run a 13.8 with my '04 GT- just an exhaust, stock tires, stock exhaust manifolds, etc. A V6 won't do that without either a lot of money in parts, plenty of nitrous, or a super aggressive tune on race gas.
__________________
Ryan
2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8

"Chrome won't get you home."
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/255364/1
Glowmunkey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-05-2005   #27 (permalink)
Pinto is offline Apprentice

V6 Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 202 Threads: 5
 Pinto's Country Flag  View Pinto's 7 photos
Longmont   Colorado
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glowmunkey
I run a 13.8 with my '04 GT- just an exhaust, stock tires, stock exhaust manifolds, etc. A V6 won't do that without either a lot of money in parts, plenty of nitrous, or a super aggressive tune on race gas.
13.1 on street tires, total of around $3000 in performance
__________________
1998 V6- 12.9@106
1994 GT- N2O'd
V6 mods- Too many to list
GT mods- now running nitrous
Pinto is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-05-2005   #28 (permalink)
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline Senior Member

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,386 Threads: 123
 Mustangdewd3.8's Country Flag  View Mustangdewd3.8's 27 photos  View Mustangdewd3.8's HomePage
Media   Pennsylvania
Send a message via AIM to Mustangdewd3.8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glowmunkey
I run a 13.8 with my '04 GT- just an exhaust, stock tires, stock exhaust manifolds, etc. A V6 won't do that without either a lot of money in parts, plenty of nitrous, or a super aggressive tune on race gas.
One most people can afford the GT- it's the insurance that gets ya

two. Yeah you can run 13.8 but not every average Joe can. Im saying 14.3 on an avergae. Meaning there are people out there running your 2004 GT you hold so proudly doing 15 second 1/4 miles lol. and 13.8 is good, you must be a good driver. But not everyone is, like the poeple you may find on the road.

Btw, have you heard of octane boost? Teehee
__________________
1994 Mustang 3.8 "Hidalgo"
2007 Mustang 4.0 "Blue"
2010 Mustang GT 4.6 "Jessica"
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-06-2005   #29 (permalink)
Glowmunkey is offline Apprentice


Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 154 Threads: 5
 Glowmunkey's Country Flag  View Glowmunkey's 13 photos  View Glowmunkey's HomePage
Albany   New York
Send a message via AIM to Glowmunkey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustangdewd3.8
One most people can afford the GT- it's the insurance that gets ya

two. Yeah you can run 13.8 but not every average Joe can. Im saying 14.3 on an avergae. Meaning there are people out there running your 2004 GT you hold so proudly doing 15 second 1/4 miles lol. and 13.8 is good, you must be a good driver. But not everyone is, like the poeple you may find on the road.

Btw, have you heard of octane boost? Teehee

Yup, seen SCC's tests, they actually got a full 2.5 points of octane with NOS racing formula or whatever. Cool stuff, but not going to allow major timing like C16.

Anyway, don't get me wrong, I don't hold my GT in high esteem... it's an ok car, did better than I expected on the track, but it is by no means a fast car, nor would I call it a "nice" car. Honestly, I bought it because it was stupidly cheap for an '04 with 4K miles on it. I routinely meet tools running 15s at the track with the same car. I'd like to think that they are the minority, launching like tards, shifting like dead cripples... Aren't there a fair number of people on this forum that have run times in the high 13s with stock cars?

And $3000 is a lot of money in parts in my book... and you're running a 100 shot - I stated without nitrous or lots of money in parts.
__________________
Ryan
2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8

"Chrome won't get you home."
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/255364/1
Glowmunkey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 06-06-2005   #30 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustangdewd3.8
but don't they put out like 60-80 more lbs ft torque?
HP is more important than torque. especially if most of your torque goes to spinning the wheels. you can always re-gear with hp, gearing gets tough in low hp/high torque applications. Check out Hot Rod either this month or last month. It has a pretty detailed explanation.

The last guy (87-93 GT with a cam) spun for two secs, so I got the jump on him, lifted for a few tenths of a sec on every shift, and shifted too early for his cam. He was off power, and would start to catch up then shift, and went back, then caught up, then went back.

Caught him off the line, and he didn't know how to drive his car.

Another guy weighed like 250-300 lbs, so in addition to his already heavier car, he was down another 80-125 lbs, and had a couple of subwoofers in the back, tacking on another 100lbs. I from the sound of it, I think he was still running the 3.08s in the rear . . .

That guy I whooped by 2 car lengths.
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E-brake light in dash comes on for no reason sometimes? 128chris 5.0L Tech 8 04-30-2009 06:42 PM
Another reason mod motors suck ! Fordgazm Mustang Lounge 17 03-27-2007 02:48 PM
Factory Alarm goes off for no reason Tempest_X 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 3 06-17-2005 05:52 PM
My first post! See pix for the reason I ordered a 2005 :) Artex 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 8 02-13-2005 05:58 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110