AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang > V6 Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 02-24-2007   #1 (permalink)
scruffman is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 206 Threads: 41
 scruffman's Country Flag
Aiken   South Carolina
Default 1992 Mustang 2.3 Fox Body Mustang Question About Swapping a Motor

here's what I've got, a 92 2.3 fox body mustang with the dual plug engine. I know this motor... well sucks. I'm trying to figure out which would be better, and easier to do. swap the motor with a turbo 4 from a t-bird, or do the v-6 swap. I'm not looking to make mega hp here, I want more power, and gas milage too.
the most I'd do with the v-6 would be, the intake and exhaust, and years down the road maybe a sc motor would be nice, but around 150 to 200 hp is all I need. I know the 2.3 turbo has to spool up to get the car going, where a 6 will use less gas to achive the same speed.

thank for your thoughts...
scruffman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #2 (permalink)
mustanghelper is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,093 Threads: 36
 mustanghelper's Country Flag  View mustanghelper's 11 photos
Central   New Jersey
Default

get a new mustang.............
__________________
DSS 331 stroker, AFR 185 heads, Performer rpm 2 intake, Accufab 75 mm race TB, 30lb injectors, 80 mm Pro-M mass air, Extreme energy cam 266.
Anderson ford power pipe the big one, Ford motor sport shorty headers, Bassani x pipe custom cat back with flows, World class T5, center force duel friction clutch.
mustanghelper is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #3 (permalink)
scruffman is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 206 Threads: 41
 scruffman's Country Flag
Aiken   South Carolina
Default

thought about that, but I do not like the body style from 94 up.
scruffman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #4 (permalink)
mustanghelper is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,093 Threads: 36
 mustanghelper's Country Flag  View mustanghelper's 11 photos
Central   New Jersey
Default

Its cheaper if you get a new one then your gonna add on parts anyway, you can find a 92 lx for 3500
__________________
DSS 331 stroker, AFR 185 heads, Performer rpm 2 intake, Accufab 75 mm race TB, 30lb injectors, 80 mm Pro-M mass air, Extreme energy cam 266.
Anderson ford power pipe the big one, Ford motor sport shorty headers, Bassani x pipe custom cat back with flows, World class T5, center force duel friction clutch.
mustanghelper is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #5 (permalink)
Kmagn13 is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 995 Threads: 44
 Kmagn13's Country Flag
Corpus   Texas
Default

you could get a SC motor for $1200 or so... you can get a 99+ V6 motor used for around $400... it would take some work but it would be nice...
__________________
02 stang, True Dual exhaust, CAI, 4.10 gears, 180 Thermostat, Diablosport tuned, dropped 2", Cross Drilled rotors, Zri Fuzion Tires, GT RSB + more
Kmagn13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #6 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scruffman View Post
here's what I've got, a 92 2.3 fox body mustang with the dual plug engine. I know this motor... well sucks. I'm trying to figure out which would be better, and easier to do. swap the motor with a turbo 4 from a t-bird, or do the v-6 swap. I'm not looking to make mega hp here, I want more power, and gas milage too.
the most I'd do with the v-6 would be, the intake and exhaust, and years down the road maybe a sc motor would be nice, but around 150 to 200 hp is all I need. I know the 2.3 turbo has to spool up to get the car going, where a 6 will use less gas to achive the same speed.

thank for your thoughts...
go to supersix motorsports. They're running a 9 second fox with a 3.8L.

It's a cheap engine, and it's durable and lightweight. It won't take a lot of dough to get it done.
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #7 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustanghelper View Post
Its cheaper if you get a new one then your gonna add on parts anyway, you can find a 92 lx for 3500
check for stress fractures if you do it.

Your chassis is probebly in good shape, since it's been understressed.

If you want a project car, you're proabably better off with the 2.3L chassis.
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #8 (permalink)
EagleAutosports is offline Forums Moderator

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34,286 Threads: 151
 EagleAutosports's Country Flag  View EagleAutosports's 546 photos  View EagleAutosports's 3 classified ads  View EagleAutosports's 1 products for your review  View EagleAutosports's HomePage
Graham   North Carolina
Send a message via MSN to EagleAutosports Send a message via Yahoo to EagleAutosports
Default

I'd suggest the TBird turbo 4. That body style didn't come with the 3.8, it came with that thrashing 2.3. You could make it work but it'd take some work. I'm thinking in terms of ease of conversion and cost. Since power isn't your top priority, I'd go that route.
__________________
MOOG Certified Tech.
For mods and sound clips, see profile and gallery.

Ask me why I ran "only" a 13.54.

Member: NMRA
Member:
White Mustang Registry #362
Member: Fuzzy Dicer
EagleAutosports is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #9 (permalink)
scruffman is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 206 Threads: 41
 scruffman's Country Flag
Aiken   South Carolina
Default

thanx eagle... I kind of figured that would be the easiest swap.. it's just to get the car up to speed the turbo spools and uses more gas... the v-6 wouldn't have used up so much as the four..

thanks guys..
scruffman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007   #10 (permalink)
lcurle is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,821 Threads: 87
 View lcurle's 3 products for your review
Earth
Default

If your going to go with a bigger engine consider re-enforcing the frame and box in as much as you can since everything will be exposed. Who knows later on down the road you may want a Cobra Jet put in there and you would have to do this anyways. Choose an engine that will equal Goal and Budget, make sure to include about 3-$400 worth of "little things" that you may not have thought of before you swap engines, like ecu, wiring harness etc etc.
__________________
1973 Mustang Notchback
400 FMX Block w/ C6 Transmission
Currently under the knife
lcurle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #11 (permalink)
scruffman is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 206 Threads: 41
 scruffman's Country Flag
Aiken   South Carolina
Default

the biggest I'll go will be a six, the 8's are more than I want.. I like power, but I one that thinks that bigger isnt always better when it comes to the motor. I've spanked 5.0 with my merk, and a few chevy's and pontiac's as well... there's nothing like the look on their faces when they ask "what you got under the hood??" and you show'em a four banger..
the reason I like the six, is I know with few mods you can hit 300hp easy.. a few more ad thats 400 plus.. without nitrous too... the only gas like that my car will ever get are my farts!! yeah easy power, almost cheap too, but I'm not a fan of it.... unless I drove a honda!!!
scruffman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #12 (permalink)
Kmagn13 is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 995 Threads: 44
 Kmagn13's Country Flag
Corpus   Texas
Default

I dont really like nitrous...hard on the engine, plus its not really that safe...
__________________
02 stang, True Dual exhaust, CAI, 4.10 gears, 180 Thermostat, Diablosport tuned, dropped 2", Cross Drilled rotors, Zri Fuzion Tires, GT RSB + more
Kmagn13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007   #13 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scruffman View Post
the biggest I'll go will be a six, the 8's are more than I want.. I like power, but I one that thinks that bigger isnt always better when it comes to the motor. I've spanked 5.0 with my merk, and a few chevy's and pontiac's as well... there's nothing like the look on their faces when they ask "what you got under the hood??" and you show'em a four banger..
the reason I like the six, is I know with few mods you can hit 300hp easy.. a few more ad thats 400 plus.. without nitrous too... the only gas like that my car will ever get are my farts!! yeah easy power, almost cheap too, but I'm not a fan of it.... unless I drove a honda!!!
when you swap out the K-member, go with a 96+ so that you can use the beefier blocks from the 01+.

Get a QA1 K-member or better -you'll save close to 50 lbs on the nose, which is nothing to sneeze at, and you can relocate the engine lower and farther back than stock.

They only run around $200 which isn't much more than you're gonna find in a salvage yard .. .
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #14 (permalink)
scruffman is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 206 Threads: 41
 scruffman's Country Flag
Aiken   South Carolina
Default

I know the whole electronis swap would be a pain, but will this motor get decent gas milage with a carb.?? and can the factory cruise control be hooked up?? I like the quadra jet carb, and figure it'd get good milage with the primarys,but those secondaries. would suck some gas!!
scruffman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #15 (permalink)
kscoyote is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,314 Threads: 298
 kscoyote's Country Flag  View kscoyote's 220 photos  View kscoyote's 1 products for your review  View kscoyote's HomePage
Topeka   Kansas
Send a message via ICQ to kscoyote Send a message via AIM to kscoyote Send a message via MSN to kscoyote Send a message via Yahoo to kscoyote
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scruffman View Post
I know the whole electronis swap would be a pain, but will this motor get decent gas milage with a carb.?? and can the factory cruise control be hooked up?? I like the quadra jet carb, and figure it'd get good milage with the primarys,but those secondaries. would suck some gas!!

yeah, you should get decent mileage, the legality of the whole thing is going to be your problem.

the MPG, if tuned correctly, and you don't go above 600 CFM (I think that may be too big) should be better than the 94+ cars, since yours will be a great deal lighter, expecially with an aftermarket K-member.


Contact Morana or Supersix, since they have experience with the swap.
__________________
Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness,his upper rooms by injustice,making his countrymen work for nothing...Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar?Did not your father have food and drink?He did what was right and just,so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy,and so all went well...But your eyes and your heart are set only on dishonest gain,on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion. Jer 22:13, 15-17
kscoyote is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Borla Stingers for my 2004 Mustang Mach 1! spartacus 4.6L Talk 15 06-14-2009 01:22 AM
Need info on stock injectors for a 2007 Mustang GT RS89Gt 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 7 05-26-2009 11:39 AM
2006 V6 Mustang... Need advice on 20 inch wheels robles Wheels and Tires 12 08-07-2008 12:03 AM
2006 Mustang GT... Do I need to upgrade valve springs with a competition stage 2 cam? silverstang01 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 43 07-16-2008 02:10 PM
2002 Mustang GT Many Modifications...Whats Next? B.Loom81 4.6L Tech 1 10-18-2007 12:13 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112