AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang > V6 Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 09-24-2007   #1 (permalink)
Black.mustang is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 5
 Black.mustang's Country Flag
orlando   Florida
Default give me a good estimate at were i stand

2002 mustang v6 with the following mods:

short ram intake
dual flowmasters
shortie headers
performance +4 spark plugs
all 4 catalytics off

runing a straight pipe from headers to exhaust

how much to the wheels and overall hp do u think iam at?
becuase i feel a huge diference compare to a stock v6

thanks
Black.mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007   #2 (permalink)
Shantox is offline Apprentice

V6 Member


Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 104 Threads: 22
 Shantox's Country Flag  View Shantox's 14 photos
Lawrenceville   Georgia
Default

Just a ballpark guess here but I would say maybe in the 215-225 range at the wheels. That being said I will leave the door open for correction .


Shantox
__________________
You really thought it was a V8 ???

2002 3.8L Mustang Coupe - H-Pipe Duals with Flowmaster 40 series / Pacesetter Headers / CAI System with K&N Filter / 17" Cobra Style rims / Racecraft Suspension / Leather Racing Interior / Carbon Fiber Interior Trim Kit / Simco White Face Gauges < They Rock !! > / Taylor SpiroPro 8mm Ignition Wires / Bosch Platinum Plugs / 450watt Blaupunkt-Bazooka Stereo
Shantox is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007   #3 (permalink)
Black.mustang is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 5
 Black.mustang's Country Flag
orlando   Florida
Default

yea thats what alot of people are telling me..in that hp range..because..ive driven a stock v6 compare to mines..and it is a huge diference..so im asuming like 215 to the wheels..and like 230-235 bhp?
Black.mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007   #4 (permalink)
ninetysixmustang is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 672 Threads: 32
 ninetysixmustang's Country Flag  View ninetysixmustang's 20 photos
Madison   Wisconsin
Default

No I'm estimating less. Stock you're running only 190HP. Your restriction is still in the intake manifold and heads. At most you would've gained 10 HP with intake and exhaust. Headers would have not netted you anything as stock ones are good enough for a stock engine. I would say 200 HP at the wheels
__________________
(>'')> Kirby-CHOP!

R.I.P.
1996 Laser Red V6
Vortech S-trim 9 psi
T-lok 3.73, Steeda Tri-ax shifter, Eibach springs, KYB shocks/struts, Steeda bumpsteer kit with X2 balljoints, Steeda clutch quadrant with adjuster, Steeda rear lower control arms (uppers coming soon) 2.5in dual exhaust with H-pipe, Borla mufflers, 3in tips.
ninetysixmustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #5 (permalink)
v6stng24 is offline Apprentice

V6 Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 187 Threads: 36
 v6stng24's Country Flag
Martins Ferry   Ohio
Default

Yeah 96 is right with the set up you have right now your not getting very much out of the mods you have. Like he said the headers arn't netting you anything right now,you'd need to go all out with the engine or put a blower in for the headers to have real effect, and taking off the cats actually hurt your low end speed. As far as the other mods go i guesse it'd depend on what kind of air intake you have and the size of the exhaust along with if crush bends were used on the exhaust to get over the axle. I've seen some exhausts add over 20 rwhp and some short ram air intakes can add 8 rwhp. But the current mods you have put on are actually holding you back a little bit.
v6stng24 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #6 (permalink)
Black.mustang is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 5
 Black.mustang's Country Flag
orlando   Florida
Default

i have a mac short ram intake..dual flowmasters H piping..straight pipe from headers to exhuast..i'am planning on getting a throttle body next..but what do you all think is a good bhp estimate for me?..230?
Black.mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #7 (permalink)
ninetysixmustang is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 672 Threads: 32
 ninetysixmustang's Country Flag  View ninetysixmustang's 20 photos
Madison   Wisconsin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black.mustang View Post
i have a mac short ram intake..dual flowmasters H piping..straight pipe from headers to exhuast..i'am planning on getting a throttle body next..but what do you all think is a good bhp estimate for me?..230?
I wouldn't waste the money on a throttle body. You need to get P&P intake and heads. You're not going to make power with a throttle body.
__________________
(>'')> Kirby-CHOP!

R.I.P.
1996 Laser Red V6
Vortech S-trim 9 psi
T-lok 3.73, Steeda Tri-ax shifter, Eibach springs, KYB shocks/struts, Steeda bumpsteer kit with X2 balljoints, Steeda clutch quadrant with adjuster, Steeda rear lower control arms (uppers coming soon) 2.5in dual exhaust with H-pipe, Borla mufflers, 3in tips.
ninetysixmustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #8 (permalink)
Menace is offline Rookie

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22 Threads: 4
 Menace's Country Flag
West Texas   Texas
Default

Quote:
You need to get P&P intake and heads
may i ask what you mean by P&P intake?
__________________
2006 V6 Automatic Vista Blue Mustang
Pypes True-Duel "X" Pipe exhaust
Violator Mufflers
Menace is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #9 (permalink)
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline Senior Member

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,393 Threads: 123
 Mustangdewd3.8's Country Flag  View Mustangdewd3.8's 27 photos  View Mustangdewd3.8's HomePage
Media   Pennsylvania
Send a message via AIM to Mustangdewd3.8
Default

running very open for a pretty unmodded N/A engine...

Prolly lost a lot of torque.

im guessing 195-200 and maybe 210-215 lbs ft torque?

P&P is a port and polish to the heads and intake manifold. Check out supersix motor sports for some set ups

that may give you a lil more considering the 99+ has a split port set up.

Good luck.
__________________
1994 Mustang 3.8 "Hidalgo"
2007 Mustang 4.0 "Blue"
2010 Mustang GT 4.6 "Jessica"
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #10 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,222 Threads: 65
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 16 photos
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black.mustang View Post
2002 mustang v6 with the following mods:

short ram intake
dual flowmasters
shortie headers
performance +4 spark plugs
all 4 catalytics off

runing a straight pipe from headers to exhaust

how much to the wheels and overall hp do u think iam at?
becuase i feel a huge diference compare to a stock v6

thanks
I don't think you are as high as you think you are. With a programmer, you could pick up another 15 or so, but you're probably around 180-190rwhp up from 150rwhp+-. Don't forget about 25%+- valvetrain loss from your stock crank rating.

I agree with ninety-six and V6stang24.
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52 Conservative 597rwhp
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #11 (permalink)
Shantox is offline Apprentice

V6 Member


Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 104 Threads: 22
 Shantox's Country Flag  View Shantox's 14 photos
Lawrenceville   Georgia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerstang View Post
I don't think you are as high as you think you are. With a programmer, you could pick up another 15 or so, but you're probably around 180-190rwhp up from 150rwhp+-. Don't forget about 25%+- valvetrain loss from your stock crank rating.

I agree with ninety-six and V6stang24.
Heya Shiner,
He has a 2002 soooooo didn't he start at 193 instead of 150 ?

Shantox
__________________
You really thought it was a V8 ???

2002 3.8L Mustang Coupe - H-Pipe Duals with Flowmaster 40 series / Pacesetter Headers / CAI System with K&N Filter / 17" Cobra Style rims / Racecraft Suspension / Leather Racing Interior / Carbon Fiber Interior Trim Kit / Simco White Face Gauges < They Rock !! > / Taylor SpiroPro 8mm Ignition Wires / Bosch Platinum Plugs / 450watt Blaupunkt-Bazooka Stereo
Shantox is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #12 (permalink)
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline Senior Member

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,393 Threads: 123
 Mustangdewd3.8's Country Flag  View Mustangdewd3.8's 27 photos  View Mustangdewd3.8's HomePage
Media   Pennsylvania
Send a message via AIM to Mustangdewd3.8
Default

I think ford advertised their engines by the power at the crank (before it hit the wheels) so technically. 94-98 produced like 105-115 at the wheels

99-04 - probably like 140-150 at the wheels
05+ - 160-170

But I was never really sure. it would make more sense, marketing wise. sounds liek you have a lot of power until it gets to the wheels haha.
__________________
1994 Mustang 3.8 "Hidalgo"
2007 Mustang 4.0 "Blue"
2010 Mustang GT 4.6 "Jessica"
Mustangdewd3.8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #13 (permalink)
v6stng24 is offline Apprentice

V6 Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 187 Threads: 36
 v6stng24's Country Flag
Martins Ferry   Ohio
Default

hmm i was always told that 2001-2004 had 190 rwhp stock. I think im just going to pretend that i never read any of the last few posts, hearing that its only 150 to the wheels is the last thing i need.

But i'd rethink the t-body black mustang, like lcurle posted before.

Throttle Body
This is one of those black sheep parts where bigger isnt better. 99+ Stock I think has a 65mm Throttle Body, or TB from now on. If your not turbo, supered or No2'ed this mod shouldn't be in the future until after a Power Adder, or PA.
v6stng24 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007   #14 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,222 Threads: 65
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 16 photos
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shantox View Post
Heya Shiner,
He has a 2002 soooooo didn't he start at 193 instead of 150 ?

Shantox
Yep, he did, but you forgot about drivetrain loss. Everyone get confused when they ask about hp. My first question is always "at the crank or to the ground." There's a big difference. Mine was 175rwhp with just CAI and duals before my tune which added 20 more. I missed that he didn't have a tuner, so his numbers are a bit lower than my last post. So that would put him around 175+- or so before a custom tune. The exhaust, headers, and he lost some hp/tq with the cat removal. He is feeling a top-end difference because of his duals. Headers and plugs are not big increasers of numbers until it gets a power adder. You just aren't going to get big numbers until you physically go into the motor to do changes.
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52 Conservative 597rwhp
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2007   #15 (permalink)
markwondi is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,378 Threads: 68
 markwondi's Country Flag  View markwondi's 22 photos
Michigan
Send a message via AIM to markwondi
Default

Do yourself a favor and upgrade those +4 spark plugs to the trash can. Get yourself a set of copper plugs and then you'll actually make power.
markwondi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mustang II suspension for a 66' Nelz_66 Classic Tech 5 07-17-2008 12:31 AM
In need of a good mechanic Michela Mustang Tech 0 01-09-2007 06:33 AM
Recomend me a good book..... 79PACER 5.0L Talk 7 12-06-2006 10:50 PM
what's a good susp upgrade? 94scgt 94-95 Tech 1 11-03-2006 01:23 PM
What's a good crate motor for a twin turbo setup? Zakabog 5.0L Talk 9 07-22-2006 02:30 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112