Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang > V6 Mustang > V6 Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.



1979-2004 V6 Mustang Tech Discussions

V6 Forums | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | 2005+ V6 Tech | V6 Pictures | Introductions | General Tech | Lounge 


Reply   Post New Thread
Unread 09-13-2008   #1 (permalink)
MUSTANG_220 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 939 Threads: 99
 MUSTANG_220's Country Flag  View MUSTANG_220's 5 photos
Redwood City   California
Default 99-04 3.8L v6 Engine and 0-60 times?

Hey everyone I want to know what is the 0-60MPH time for a 2000 3.8L V6 with an automatic transmission I know that car and driver found that the manual 3.8L V6 does 0-60 in about 7.1 secs. But what does the auto 3.8L do it in? And also is it true that the 01-04 mustang V6's have different engines than the 99-00 v6 mustangs? because someone on this site said that the 2003-2004 v6 puts out 248FT-Lbs of torque is that true I have seen no site that can confirm this info. Thanks to anyone who can answer both my questions I appreciate it!!!
__________________
"The Sponsor Of Birthdays"
(American Cancer Society)
2003 White Ford Mustang GT (5-Speed)
2003 Black Ford Mustang Mach 1 (5-speed)
MUSTANG_220 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Unread 09-13-2008   #2 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,962 Threads: 80
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 17 photos  View shinerstang's HomePage
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Probably around 8 seconds or so.......
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
1993 Foxbody

"Certified Psychopaths That Can Make Your V6 Fast"
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-16-2008   #3 (permalink)
cmaurer1 is offline Made Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,553 Threads: 9
 cmaurer1's Country Flag
Terre Haute   Indiana
Default

Where have all of these people been getting the 250 ftlbs of trq from? I have never heard that before and then all of a sudden I am seeing it all over this site... If they had 250trq stock they would be a tad quicker to 60mph than 8+ seconds...
cmaurer1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-16-2008   #4 (permalink)
MUSTANG_220 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 939 Threads: 99
 MUSTANG_220's Country Flag  View MUSTANG_220's 5 photos
Redwood City   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmaurer1 View Post
Where have all of these people been getting the 250 ftlbs of trq from? I have never heard that before and then all of a sudden I am seeing it all over this site... If they had 250trq stock they would be a tad quicker to 60mph than 8+ seconds...

I cant agree with you more. I really dont believe that the 01-04 mustangs came with that much more torque. I dont even believe 235 ftlbs of torque. 225FTlbs is acceptable though.
__________________
"The Sponsor Of Birthdays"
(American Cancer Society)
2003 White Ford Mustang GT (5-Speed)
2003 Black Ford Mustang Mach 1 (5-speed)
MUSTANG_220 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2008   #5 (permalink)
3800cc is offline Rookie


Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8 Threads: 2
 3800cc's Country Flag
Saugus   California
Default You're not gonna like this reply...

I have an 01 v6 auto.

No other car out there has a bigger difference in the 0-60 times than the 99-04 v6 between the stick and the auto.

Stick is 7.5 seconds. Auto is 8.5 - 9.2 seconds. 9.2 for California.

The 01-04 is an internally balanced engine where the 99-00 is externally balanced. This is why an ud pulley for 99-00 is less than $100 and for 01-04 is more than $200.

The 01-04 also has a stronger block.
__________________
2001 auto, homemade cai, VAPauto 1/2" mani spacer, ud pulley
3800cc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-20-2008   #6 (permalink)
m8trix23 is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 260 Threads: 30
 m8trix23's Country Flag  View m8trix23's 4 photos
Indianapolis   Indiana
Default

Im running for times Oct 16th in Heartland. Ill post times maybe vid after. Running CAI, Pypes X 2.5, stock 16" tires, 65mm TB, and more soon to come
m8trix23 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2008   #7 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,962 Threads: 80
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 17 photos  View shinerstang's HomePage
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m8trix23 View Post
Im running for times Oct 16th in Heartland. Ill post times maybe vid after. Running CAI, Pypes X 2.5, stock 16" tires, 65mm TB, and more soon to come
I run for times about 6 times a month......

Do you have an auto or manual? 1/4 or 1/8th mile? Do you have a programmer?
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
1993 Foxbody

"Certified Psychopaths That Can Make Your V6 Fast"
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2008   #8 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,962 Threads: 80
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 17 photos  View shinerstang's HomePage
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmaurer1 View Post
Where have all of these people been getting the 250 ftlbs of trq from? I have never heard that before and then all of a sudden I am seeing it all over this site... If they had 250trq stock they would be a tad quicker to 60mph than 8+ seconds...
Don't forget here guys. They are measuring torque/hp at the crank, not to the wheels. That's why an auto is slower-more parasitic loss than a manual.......

There are many factors to consider when trying to determine track times......
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
1993 Foxbody

"Certified Psychopaths That Can Make Your V6 Fast"
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2008   #9 (permalink)
MUSTANG_220 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 939 Threads: 99
 MUSTANG_220's Country Flag  View MUSTANG_220's 5 photos
Redwood City   California
Default

Shinerstang why is it that automatic trannies have more HP loss?
__________________
"The Sponsor Of Birthdays"
(American Cancer Society)
2003 White Ford Mustang GT (5-Speed)
2003 Black Ford Mustang Mach 1 (5-speed)
MUSTANG_220 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-23-2008   #10 (permalink)
b1lk1 is offline Made Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,826 Threads: 13
 b1lk1's Country Flag  View b1lk1's 1 classified ad
Acton   Ontario
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MUSTANG_220 View Post
Shinerstang why is it that automatic trannies have more HP loss?
Because an automatic transmission is nothing more than a giant fluid pump whereas a manual transmission is all gears other than the clutch. An automatic relies on fluid pressure to couple the flywheel to the drivetrain while the manual uses a friction clutch. Once the clutch is engaged it is out of the picture while the torque converter and front pump always require power from the engine.
b1lk1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-23-2008   #11 (permalink)
cmaurer1 is offline Made Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,553 Threads: 9
 cmaurer1's Country Flag
Terre Haute   Indiana
Default

Easiest answer- They are heavier.

Shinerstang, I know the difference between crank and wheel hp. What I meant was I had never heard that the split-ports had 250 crank trq. If they did have that much trq. they would be able to run better track times. That is 20-30 more trq. than they are rated as.
cmaurer1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-24-2008   #12 (permalink)
MUSTANG_220 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 939 Threads: 99
 MUSTANG_220's Country Flag  View MUSTANG_220's 5 photos
Redwood City   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmaurer1 View Post
Easiest answer- They are heavier.

Shinerstang, I know the difference between crank and wheel hp. What I meant was I had never heard that the split-ports had 250 crank trq. If they did have that much trq. they would be able to run better track times. That is 20-30 more trq. than they are rated as.

Yea thats what I thought too. Because that is a lot but I could definetely see 2-5 Ft-lbs of torque though.
__________________
"The Sponsor Of Birthdays"
(American Cancer Society)
2003 White Ford Mustang GT (5-Speed)
2003 Black Ford Mustang Mach 1 (5-speed)
MUSTANG_220 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-25-2009   #13 (permalink)
Big Daddy's Stang> is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,522 Threads: 19
 Big Daddy's Stang>'s Country Flag  View Big Daddy's Stang>'s 5 photos
West Coast   California
Default

the only thing i know it that from the 01-04 or 03-04 the stang has 3 more hp 193. and a little bit more of tq.
Big Daddy's Stang> is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-26-2009   #14 (permalink)
cmaurer1 is offline Made Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,553 Threads: 9
 cmaurer1's Country Flag
Terre Haute   Indiana
Default

The reason that the 01+'s run better times and make better power is the IMRC and that helps with the peak number's mainly and the windage tray. It is still a nice little feature to have though.
cmaurer1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-08-2010   #15 (permalink)
wildff08 is offline Rookie

V6 Member


Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9 Threads: 2
 wildff08's Country Flag
Weed   California
Default

I have and 01 v6 with bbk intake, motivator throttle body spacer, bbk throttle body, bbk headers, dual flowmasters, and a diablosport programmer. I'm going to the drags in a few weeks. (It is a manual) my launches are horrible. I either spin out or its extremely slow. What do I need to do to better my launch? And what should I be running. I've been running 16.8. Not cool.
wildff08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply   Post New Thread



Thread Tools



Mustang Photos
Mustang Links    Top Sites    RSS    Link To Us    Add to Favorites    Archive    Terms of Use    Site Rules    Privacy    Contact    Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2011 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143