AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang > V6 Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | V6 Talk | V6 Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 12-18-2008   #16 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,222 Threads: 65
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 16 photos
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StalkerStang View Post
Oh I need a lot of things...but anyways...I plan to go just a little bit bigger, and I'm very eager and excited to be building myself another motor it deserves so much more than a 300 HP 302.
Gearheads 410 runs 10's on pump gas. And his drag car runs 9's on race gas for the last 3 years reliably......
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52 Conservative 597rwhp
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008   #17 (permalink)
StalkerStang is offline Made Member

V6 Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,750 Threads: 30
 StalkerStang's Country Flag  View StalkerStang's 13 photos  View StalkerStang's 13 products for your review  View StalkerStang's HomePage
Surprise   Arizona
Send a message via Yahoo to StalkerStang
Default

I have no doubt that it performes well, but I'm one of those that wants to do it myself you know? I pick the parts, and I do all the work to make the power. I'm sure you understand
__________________
Jesse Berger
90 LX, Previous 4 cyl. (Decommissioned, 351W on the way)
H/C/I+Bolt Ons
Best ET: 12.54@106 mph

2001 V6 5 Speed Daily Driver
Windstar Intake, Dual Exhuast, CAI, Headers
Best ET: 15.6@88 mph (stock trim)
StalkerStang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008   #18 (permalink)
shinerstang is offline Top Dog

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,222 Threads: 65
 shinerstang's Country Flag  View shinerstang's 16 photos
Greensburg   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StalkerStang View Post
I have no doubt that it performes well, but I'm one of those that wants to do it myself you know? I pick the parts, and I do all the work to make the power. I'm sure you understand
Sure do!!!!! That's why I'm rebuilding the '02 on my own with Gearheads watchful eye. He's a master......
__________________
2002 V6 Turbo 10:25@134.52 Conservative 597rwhp
2001 V6 Nitrous 12:94@104.88
shinerstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008   #19 (permalink)
Draco_mustang is offline Rookie


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 96 Threads: 21
 Draco_mustang's Country Flag
Montebello   California
Default

Is it really true SSM stage 3 add's 90HP? I was talking to a mechanic and he told me that it wasn't likley I would get 90, he said it would be more like 70, 75. He also said that their prices were kinda' rediculous, but thats another story.
Draco_mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008   #20 (permalink)
ewells2420 is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 448 Threads: 12
 ewells2420's Country Flag
Somewhere   North Carolina
Default

I would believe SSM if they say it adds 90 then thats what should make ..... about. And thats flywheel HP btw. Of course it will depend on how old your engine is and whatnot.

Prices ......... seem ok to me I guess.
ewells2420 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008   #21 (permalink)
tex117 is offline Made Member

V6 Member


Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,655 Threads: 42
 tex117's Country Flag
San Marcos   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco_mustang View Post
Is it really true SSM stage 3 add's 90HP? I was talking to a mechanic and he told me that it wasn't likley I would get 90, he said it would be more like 70, 75. He also said that their prices were kinda' rediculous, but thats another story.
After I did just the 2+ heads and cam I made just shy of 220 to the wheels. Do the math on drivetrain loss and that's just under 260 bhp. So with out doing the intakes I got 65 hp over stock. Of course that is with the bolt-ons I already had.

After I save up some $$$ I will do the intakes and I can see if the power pack numbers are correct.
__________________
2002 v6 manual, SSM P&P Heads, Comp Cam from SSM, and some other stuff full list in profile.
214 RWHP, 215 RWTQ

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so"
-Ronald Reagan
tex117 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
4.2, cheap, power, stroker, torque



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will a 4.6 intake spacer fit a 3.8 Mustang? v6stng24 V6 Tech 7 12-17-2007 01:44 AM
4.2 V6 and 3.8 V6 head and intake swap ckracedesigns V6 Talk 7 04-27-2007 11:08 AM
stroke 3.8 or swap to 4.2 donks232 V6 Tech 2 06-13-2006 10:18 AM
want to convert 89lx to 5 lug disc cheapest route doctane 5.0L Tech 2 06-12-2004 11:50 PM
Can you convert a 3.8 FWD to RWD? Cracker289 V6 Tech 6 05-28-2003 11:47 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112