Ford Mustang Forum - View Single Post - rwhp for shelby and roush
View Single Post
post #10 of (permalink) Old 06-06-2014
daustin
PONY Member
 
daustin's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 768
 
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatopotomus View Post
15% is the standard rule of thumb for parasitic loss. It would be a little bit more for an auto. But a dyno is a dyno, there are many factors that go into producing a final RWHP. There is weather, temperature, mechanically variation on the dyno, mechanical tolerances in the particular engine.

But 15% is a decent guesstimate for what crank HP will translate to at the rear.

I don't think a percentage is an accurate rule of thumb for parasitic loss. Say you have an engine with 500 hp in a car and take that 15% parasitic loss, you have 425 to the wheels (75 hp loss). Now say you have a 1,000hp engine in the same car; taking that same 15%, you would have 850 to the wheels (150 hp loss). How did the same drivetrain just take 75 more hp to spin?


Sent from AutoGuide.com App

2016 Mustang GT 401a, 6A, Magnetic Metallic, Nav, Shaker Pro, 20" SVE Series 3's, Steeda CAI, Corsa Sports, BMR SP080 Springs, BMR Caster/Camber Plates, JLT Catch Can, Redline Hood Struts.....

2014 Mustang GT 400a, 6M, Recaros, 3.73's, 19" Drifts, electronics/nav., Kooks A/B's, AED Tune /Steeda CAI/BBQ Igniter Tick... SOLD
daustin is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome