Ford Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Visual Comparo: '69 Mach vs S197 vs S550
View Single Post
post #36 of (permalink) Old 09-26-2014
Blazin72
BOSS Member
 
Blazin72's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Union
Posts: 3,543
           
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013 R/Red 5.0 View Post
If you don't like those 3 criteria then perhaps you shouldn't be driving Mustangs, because that's exactly what it's been. The new Stang officially lost 1" of headroom, and extra headroom is what I like and extra headroom is what I want.
I've shied away from Camaros exactly because I do not like the sit low/slung back seating position, and Ford accommodated with the Mustang.
What you're saying is that it's your opinion against mine? Which is the same thing that's gone round and round since this thread has started.

So... Should the Mustang look like what I think it should look like or should it look like what you think it should look like?

In fact, it seems to me that our only disagreement was in seating position. And I still think it sounds like you should be driving a truck because I'm not sure how somebody who wants a high seating position AND extra headroom could ever be happy in a car of just about any kind. Well, maybe a minivan...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013 R/Red 5.0 View Post

Mine was short, curt, accurate, and historically correct.
And vague. Which is part of my point. What a Mustang should look like is open to interpretation.

Last edited by slorydn1; 09-26-2014 at 09:52 PM. Reason: deleted part of the quoted post that drew a warning//deleted part of response that was no longer necessary
Blazin72 is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome