Basically every section of that Autotrader article ended in a draw (or at least with them saying the two cars were "similar"), and then all of a sudden at the end the Camaro is better in every category?
For example, power/performance are deemed a "draw" in the Performance and Fuel Economy section, yet power is cited as a reason why the Camaro is better value. That doesn't make any sense. To me, equal performance should favour the Mustang's better fuel economy, but apparently not in this case.
Current: 2014 V6 Mustang Premium, Automatic Transmission, Oxford White, Safety & Security Package.
Previous: 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt LS, bone-stock except for automatic transmission.