2015 2.3 Ecoboost vs 5.0 v8: Which one to buy? - Page 4 - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
SHELBY GT 350 Member
5.0L Member
S197 Member
 
slorydn1's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: New Bern
Posts: 6,081
                 
Garage
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by retrosix View Post
GT is gonna be ridiculous out of the box, the 2.3 is gonna take some extra tweaking and cash. id prefer to not mess with it and get 400 hp to the wheels from the factory.
You're not gonna get 400 to the wheels direct from the factory, but I still wholeheartedly agree with your premise



Hers:2012 Mustang GT Premium,6M,Kona Blue Exterior/Charcoal Interior, 400A, HID/Security Pkg ,Comfort Pkg.
[COLOR="DimGray"][B]His: 2014 Mustang GT Premium,6M,Sterling Gray Exterior/Charcoal Interior,400A, Reverse Sensing/Security Pkg, Comfort Pkg SMR# 3635
slorydn1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Apprentice
 
KC3333's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: midwest
Posts: 246
 
I have a 444HP 302 and a 305HP V6. I think it's a pretty good analogy.

The V8 has the rumble, ability to snap you back in your seat, and pulls forever.

The 6 is accelerates respectfully, is easy to whip around, and gets 30 MPG.

Sounds like the 2.3T will have about the same HP as the '11+ V6, better torque and better sound. It's probably not gonna snap you back in your seat, but will probably get you closer to the 50/50 weight distro, and let you skip every 4th fill up you'd have with the 5.0.


2012 Boss Yellow Blaze, Recaros/Torsen, Cover/Mats
2012 MCA PP Sterling/Lava
KC3333 is offline  
Rookie
 
Mattwood440's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 20
 
Talking

I'm not too sure the mpg wouldn't drop like a stone after you start modding the 4. At least that was my experience with turbo cars from the 80s.

The $7000 and weight savings with the 4 may not really be valid either. When I bought mine in 08 people were saying what a value the V6 was price and weight-wise but the comparison was apples to oranges. You got A LOT tougher parts such as the trans and diff plus more standard equipment with the GT, starting with the bigger wheels. The actual difference was minuscule price-wise and I think the 4.6 3v fulled dressed engine weighed a whopping 20lbs more than the iron 4.0. And whether you use it or not, a 3 year warranty (actually 5 on the powertrain) has monetary value. I know all this because I bought the V6 and put a Procharger on it at 14k miles.

Now I don't know what the specific differences are between the 2 as of right now and it really doesn't matter. This time around I'm getting a base GT and putting a supercharger system on that as well.

Stage II Procharged 15 GT
Mattwood440 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1