G
Guest
·October issue of 5.0 Mustang has Paul's CMRC deletes gaining 11.4 rwhp/ 17.5 rwtq. I think that is a bit "embellished" albeit it mainly happens at the lower rpm range (3-4k rpm).
Never the less, those numbers ARE significant for $199.00.
Even if they are 10/15 it is a great HP/ $ ratio.
Steeda's have gone up, $320 vs $199 ?!? Steeda's look lot's prettier but, who cares. Paul's appear to have new O-rings anyways.
I wanted to do this mod when I first got my GT but was talked out of it by the local speed shop saying it took away "low end torque" which is not the case per the a.m. dyno graphs. "...even tested below 1000rpm, and at no point did the factory CMRC setup provide any power nor torque advantage."
This is encouraging news to us guys always looking for a few more Ponies.
Anybody done the deletes and if so please give dyno feedback if you have it known. A re-tune is mandatory apparantly, which adds to the belief of more air to the heads. The stock "clean emmisions" clap trap may be a Pony Robber after all.
I am seriously thinking about Paul's for my Pony.
Any comments are welcomed.
Never the less, those numbers ARE significant for $199.00.
Even if they are 10/15 it is a great HP/ $ ratio.
Steeda's have gone up, $320 vs $199 ?!? Steeda's look lot's prettier but, who cares. Paul's appear to have new O-rings anyways.
I wanted to do this mod when I first got my GT but was talked out of it by the local speed shop saying it took away "low end torque" which is not the case per the a.m. dyno graphs. "...even tested below 1000rpm, and at no point did the factory CMRC setup provide any power nor torque advantage."
This is encouraging news to us guys always looking for a few more Ponies.
Anybody done the deletes and if so please give dyno feedback if you have it known. A re-tune is mandatory apparantly, which adds to the belief of more air to the heads. The stock "clean emmisions" clap trap may be a Pony Robber after all.
I am seriously thinking about Paul's for my Pony.
Any comments are welcomed.