There was actually more than just price that went into my choice of purchase.
I love my Stang, but I wish it had more power... Im working on that :winks
I love my Stang, but I wish it had more power... Im working on that :winks
gto'S DON'T SELL well anywhere but Australia...Fleg said:GTO's just don't sell well in this area. I've seen only a few on the road. I bet it's better to move them off the lot then let them take up floor space and inventory.
Actually, market wise they performed up to GM's expectations for the 05 model year. Markups were the problems with the 04's.JEB said:gto'S DON'T SELL well anywhere but Australia...
Maybe the power of a free market economy is speaking here, you know supply and DEMAND......
A 310 HP Z pulling 12's stock? doubt it.Kyle F said:Wow, Ford must have paid some serious cash to advertise in that Magazine.
Im sorry and LS1 Z28 running a 13.8?:eyebulge:
Who was driving that thing... my grandma?
Plenty of Mags out there posted sub 13.3 times for those. If you want to magazine race, I have an issue of GM High Tech Performance and they put a set of slicks on a boe stock 98 and ran a 12.9. 00-02 have more power. So figure a 12.7
Under $30K and only cost $400 for the slicks and Bam... first car under $30K to run 12s... adjusted for inflation.
There is just no way that an 05 Mustang GT is faster than a LS1. :handball:
Ummm, maybe it pulls harder later. But we were talking 0-60, I think. Slicks will give any RWD car a noticable improvement in the quarter. And GM seems to over-rate their cars, where I have seen Ford under-rate theirs. Car and Driver especially favors GM . An example of Ford advertising the stang 0-60 in like 5.1 then it was done by Motor Trend at 4.9. GM quit making the F-body for a reason. Also, the stang is still around for a reason. Ponder that thought.Kyle F said:Wow, Ford must have paid some serious cash to advertise in that Magazine.
Im sorry and LS1 Z28 running a 13.8?:eyebulge:
Who was driving that thing... my grandma?
Plenty of Mags out there posted sub 13.3 times for those. If you want to magazine race, I have an issue of GM High Tech Performance and they put a set of slicks on a boe stock 98 and ran a 12.9. 00-02 have more power. So figure a 12.7
Under $30K and only cost $400 for the slicks and Bam... first car under $30K to run 12s... adjusted for inflation.
There is just no way that an 05 Mustang GT is faster than a LS1. :handball:
Like I said, supply and DEMAND.Kyle F said:Actually, market wise they performed up to GM's expectations for the 05 model year. Markups were the problems with the 04's.
GM has priced them too high. When they did the Employee pricing the first month, the GTO was on it. Then, they had to take it of the subsequent moths because they were sellign too many and realized they could still reach their targets at MSRP.
You have to remember with the GTO its not about volume... at most they can make 18,000 per year. That is nothing in todays automotive productions. So, yes... you have to pay a premium to own a GTO over what the market dictates. I chose not to pay the preimium the GM, and not the dealers, are asking for.
I dont know where you live, but the GTOs do nto sit on lots here in Tennesse, or when I was in Ohio, or Georgia.JEB said:Like I said, supply and DEMAND.
Nobody is demanding a goat.
Wait till the Shelby Cobra comes out, I highly doubt it'll sit rusting on the lot like the goats are...And several Vipers I've seen....
And, it will not be a status symbol for older middle aged guys like the vette... It'll be a muscle car for muscle car types.
I spent 3 months on a job in San Diego. Every day I drove by a Pontiac dealer that still in April-June had 2 04 GTOs on the lot along with 3 05s. All 5 of them sat there on the lot the whole time I was there.Kyle F said:I dont know where you live, but the GTOs do nto sit on lots here in Tennesse, or when I was in Ohio, or Georgia.
I can think of many reasons why the F-body is gone and the Mustang is here. It is defiantely not because the mustang was faster 3 years ago. :sterb:
How Successful would the Mustang be today if it was still rolling ont he 79 Chassis? I woudln't have bought one. The consumer didn't kill the F-body, GM did by not updating it.
He's already said he'd pick the GMpoop if available.....66stang351 said:I spent 3 months on a job in San Diego. Every day I drove by a Pontiac dealer that still in April-June had 2 04 GTOs on the lot along with 3 05s. All 5 of them sat there on the lot the whole time I was there.
P.S. the reason that the Mustang outlived the F-body is because then and now it was more bang for the buck. A $30,000 310 hp vs.a $21,000 260 hp car that was nearly as fast and for half the difference could be faster. What would you pick?
Not to mention it looks just like a riced out CavalierJEB said:He's already said he'd pick the GMpoop if available.....
Your seeing those goats mirrors mine here in Tampa, but there are several more in the area (Dade City, Zephyrhills, St. Pete.) They are just NOT in demand. I mean, really, look at them. I don't care if they give gold bricks along with them....