Ford Mustang Forum banner

Cylinder head shaving advice??

2929 Views 6 Replies 3 Participants Last post by  P4452
OK... ive been all over the internet looking for advice but i cant find any. I have a set of heads for my 3.8l already ported and polished. Does anyone have any idea about how far i need to shave the mating surface of the heads to reach 10:1 compression... i know that the 3.8l has about a 9.3:1 compression already.. any advice?
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Consult with your local machine shop, they have a manual that give the height spec for every engine. Height spec i.e. maximum milling allowed spec, this can be measured from a called out srface to the head gasket surface and also you might need to c.c. the combustion chambers. If the heads are still in the usable range it should be a simple math problem.
See less See more
CC the combustion chambers, determine quench/squish distance, and do the appropriate math. Piston height and head gasket thickness will be crucial.

Stock static compression ratio on the '97 3.8L is 9.37:1. Reference your year's owner's manual to confirm.
The CR of my car mathematically confirmed 9.27:1. Now i found out from amazing customer service at SSMS that the max you can mill is about .030" before interfering with coolant channels and clearance issues.. and it will give me about 9.8:1 CR. close enough for me... now i need to find out how much i need to Advance or Retard timing and what the best WOT fuel air ratio is
See less See more
Your cam will make a lot of those choices for you... If you're keeping the stock cam, it might just be a matter of raising octane.

These cars run VERY high WOT ARF stock. Like 11-11.5:1. You should shoot for 12.5 to 13:1. Leaner makes more power, richer makes it safer, as I'm sure you know. However, lean mixtures also burn slower, thus requring more advance to get the most out of(also generating more heat, risking detonation). Rich mixtures, of course, burn faster. A lot of cars end up with more fuel and timing than they really need...
See less See more
remember this about engines they are AIR PUMPS, the more air in and out, the more power made. Cams, Pistons, Stroke all play a role and moving the through the intake is a crucial part of the equation. Of course it's just takes $$$$$ and there is an endless supply of that, right.LOL
remember this about engines they are AIR PUMPS, the more air in and out, the more power made. Cams, Pistons, Stroke all play a role and moving the through the intake is a crucial part of the equation. Of course it's just takes $$$$$ and there is an endless supply of that, right.LOL
Turbo's and superchargers are "air pumps"... Engines have timing and other associated quirks.

Compression ratio has a very direct impact on power level. Higher compression, to a point, increases thermal efficiency, meaning that less fuel is used to achieve the same power level.

I saw many of the world's most advanced engines, including a 2004 Ferrari F1 3.0L V10, while I was at Ferrari World last year. (I may post photos later...) They use insanely huge ports to feed that 19,000 RPM 3.0L 900 HP beast. They also use 17:1 compression. Both(ports and compression) are equally important. Regardless, one is much easier to effectively modify...
See less See more
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top