Joined
·
1,072 Posts
Other than compression ratio, how does deck clearance affect an engine?
With a 4.125" bore, 3.4" stroke, .041" compressed gasket size, 70CC combustion chambers and 0.000" deck clearance comes to 10.43:1 compression ratio.
In a boosted application with the above build is it beneficial to be "out of the hole" by a bit or "under the hole"?
Just in case the information is needed the parts I am putting on my list for the build is as follows:
Dart Iron Eagle 363 rotating assembly
-(Includes forged crank, forged H beam connecting rods, and forged flat top pistons)
TFS 225CC Highport heads
TFS Box-R-Series upper/lower intake
Custom grind cam - undecided on what manufacturer
Second set of questions:
Single turbo, parallel turbos of equal sizes, parallel turbos of staggered size(One smaller one larger), hybrid-turbocharger and sequential turbos.
How do each of these setups act as far as turbo lag and boost threshold?
Is e-boosting reliable? If so, how does it compare to other turbo setups?
With a 4.125" bore, 3.4" stroke, .041" compressed gasket size, 70CC combustion chambers and 0.000" deck clearance comes to 10.43:1 compression ratio.
In a boosted application with the above build is it beneficial to be "out of the hole" by a bit or "under the hole"?
Just in case the information is needed the parts I am putting on my list for the build is as follows:
Dart Iron Eagle 363 rotating assembly
-(Includes forged crank, forged H beam connecting rods, and forged flat top pistons)
TFS 225CC Highport heads
TFS Box-R-Series upper/lower intake
Custom grind cam - undecided on what manufacturer
Second set of questions:
Single turbo, parallel turbos of equal sizes, parallel turbos of staggered size(One smaller one larger), hybrid-turbocharger and sequential turbos.
How do each of these setups act as far as turbo lag and boost threshold?
Is e-boosting reliable? If so, how does it compare to other turbo setups?