Ford Mustang Forum banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have a 1968 289 2v that im turning into a 289 4v with a flat tappet hydraulic cam. I purchased a federal mogul engine rebuild kit from summit and I had the engine machined and cleaned up and now im putting it back together with an edelbrock performer dual plane intake manifold and a performer 600 cfm carb. the specs on the new cam are
Lift: intake: 448
exhaust: 472
Duration: Intake: 262
Exhaust: 272
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I have flat top pistons by sealed power
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Its also said that the CR is 9.1 with 58cc heads the heads on the 68 are 63cc and the original CR was 8.7
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
That sounds a bit high. The 289 from 68 put out a very low 195 hp which is very generous (more like 165) so a mild cam and 4bbl carb probably wont make me get up in the 300s.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
42 Posts
I have a 302 with forged, dished pistons with the stock 2bbl heads that have been ported and bigger stainless valves added. They are 58cc heads. My compression is 9.2 to 1. I have a comp cam that has a slightly lumpy idle but dont know the specs. I have the 670 street avenger, edelbrock dual plane performer intake, and clipster shorty headers. C-4 automatic and 3:55 posi rear. Mid 300's ?? I wish. It dyno'ed out at 218 rwhp. Hope that give you an idea of what you can expect.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
haha yeah im expecting something along the lines of 150rwhp tops
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,230 Posts
the 84 mustangs with a similar bottom end and a 4bbl carb setup made around 175 flywheel from the factory through a 2 to 1 to 2 type exhaust

If you put a nice exhaust on it you're looking at 175-200 flywheel hp
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
but the 84 was a 5.0 im running a 289
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,230 Posts
a difference of 13 cubic inches...maybe 5 hp.

they're VERY similar....both had nearly the same compression ratio, and both had flat tappet cams...but the 84 comes with better exhaust, a factory aluminum intake and a factory 4 bbl carb...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
898 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
good deal so the compression ratio was 8.8:1?
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top