not that simple, i'm afraid
well, actual top speed to the mph is probably impossible to tell. Not all GTs off the same production line will have EXACTLY the same top speed to start with. Then, figure in road surface and conditions, and it varies mile to mile. all comparison is purely theoretical and subject to too many variables to be at all useful. bottom line: it's a little lower. Do you need to go 147 instead of 132?
As for gas useage, it will be theoretically equal to the percentage increase in RPMs at a given speed. This, in turn, is a direct mathematical relation to the change in gearing. works like this:
(4.10-3.55)/3.55 = % of gearing increase = % increase in rpms for a given mph. It also more or less = the % increase in fuel consumption. "More or less" because effective load on the engine will differ because of the gearing change. Also, throttle mapping across the RPM spectrum differs, so fuel delivery is slightly different. If you reflash a custom tune to account for the gears, all this goes right out the window. All of this is null and void unless you drive PRECISELY the same way. I'd bet a big part of the declining mileage you will experience is the sudden fondness of the gas pedal for the floor board.:hihi: :hihi:
having said all that, if you go from 3.55 to 4.10, and were getting 17.5 mpg, you will then get 14.8 mpg. In a mathmatically perfect, theoretical world.:shigrin
bottom line: mileage is worse. Do the gears and enjoy the heck out of it.
well, actual top speed to the mph is probably impossible to tell. Not all GTs off the same production line will have EXACTLY the same top speed to start with. Then, figure in road surface and conditions, and it varies mile to mile. all comparison is purely theoretical and subject to too many variables to be at all useful. bottom line: it's a little lower. Do you need to go 147 instead of 132?
As for gas useage, it will be theoretically equal to the percentage increase in RPMs at a given speed. This, in turn, is a direct mathematical relation to the change in gearing. works like this:
(4.10-3.55)/3.55 = % of gearing increase = % increase in rpms for a given mph. It also more or less = the % increase in fuel consumption. "More or less" because effective load on the engine will differ because of the gearing change. Also, throttle mapping across the RPM spectrum differs, so fuel delivery is slightly different. If you reflash a custom tune to account for the gears, all this goes right out the window. All of this is null and void unless you drive PRECISELY the same way. I'd bet a big part of the declining mileage you will experience is the sudden fondness of the gas pedal for the floor board.:hihi: :hihi:
having said all that, if you go from 3.55 to 4.10, and were getting 17.5 mpg, you will then get 14.8 mpg. In a mathmatically perfect, theoretical world.:shigrin
bottom line: mileage is worse. Do the gears and enjoy the heck out of it.