Ford Mustang Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 3 of 27 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
11,082 Posts
FunkyBoss said:
I had a Trans Am drive by me last night (going the opposite direction while I was at a red light...so no racing here) and it sounded sweet, but I have heard many mustangs sound just as good. I always wanted a Camaro when I was a kid, but I guess I am wising up with age. I would agree That the T/A looks better than the Camaro, but the stang tops them both, IMO. If money allows, look for a 2000 Cobra, thats what I would do.
You mean the Cobra R?!?!?!

Or a 2001 Cobra?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,082 Posts
ran260gt said:
Man those numbers suck ! Must have had a bad driver to get 14.5 and a 13.7 out of those cars !
No, that's factory stock, with the spare, factory tires at factory spec, etc. The variable would be the atmospheric conditions, -also remember they were verts. For the 1999 model year they tested the coupes.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,082 Posts
blackfang said:
Come on people, lets stop comparing magazine times as all those times suck for those cars and we have seen people pull better times.
I have seen low 13 second stock LS1's and Mach 1's and 13.8 bone stock GT's
different cars can vary by a couple of tenths, and altitude & humidy can add or subtract a couple of tenths, and once they're broken in they'll pick up a couple of tenths

So depending on the car, and where it is, & how old it is, the times can vary by as much as 0.5+
 
1 - 3 of 27 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top