I have the 1000 and IMHO it's not worth the price difference. I only got it because I didn't want to wait and therefore got a car off the lot.rcviper25 said:
I have the 1000 and IMHO it's not worth the price difference. I only got it because I didn't want to wait and therefore got a car off the lot.rcviper25 said:Hey guys,
Well my question is pretty simple. I know that the shaker 1000 is better that the shaker 500... but is it worth the extra money? I have enough money to buy the car... but at the same time, it's only just enough and I need the monthly payments as low as possible. Performance is the name of the game with these new mustangs (and I love the new look). Could I live with the shaker 500 going from a Mach 460? Or should I just close my eyes and sign the deal with $1000 tached on to the overall price?
This was my solution. Better sound for less $$$$$, But I already had the amp. http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/2005-mustang-gt-tech/46977-shaker-1700-a.htmlHey guys,
Well my question is pretty simple. I know that the shaker 1000 is better that the shaker 500... but is it worth the extra money? I have enough money to buy the car... but at the same time, it's only just enough and I need the monthly payments as low as possible. Performance is the name of the game with these new mustangs (and I love the new look). Could I live with the shaker 500 going from a Mach 460? Or should I just close my eyes and sign the deal with $1000 tached on to the overall price?
Actually, I'd pay to have the trunk space back...I'm with dekujala. I didn't want to spend the extra $$$ on the 1000. I have heard both the 1000 and the 500. I opted for the 500 and I'm using my sub and amp that I already have and I will install that for the bass. I can get WAY more bass than the 1000 can put out for much less than the $1000 price difference.