Personally, I'd go with a 180.
My water pump is just fine but my rad is not. Its got a leak were the plastic tank goins the side of the rad so its getting replaced this week. And as long as iv owned the car its ran some-what hot, around 210+ on the hot days before the Taurus fan, now it still floats around the lower 200s, hotter then id like it to be. So im thinking the 160 is flowing the coolant out of the radiator faster then it can cool, hopefully that's my problem. Ill probably switch it out when i get the new radiatorLook to make sure your radiator is not clogged up or full of crud. Also I would probably slap a 180 in there also.
And a correction, i dont have the MAF conversion done yet. Sorry that's my bad, my sig kinda makes it sound like im saying i have it done alreadyBTW, These figures are for the A9L. He's done the MAF conversion so I assume this is what he's got.
+1Dynobrat, I have to disagree with your statement. With a 160 degree thermostat either 2 things are going to happen. First, if his cooling setup is good enough to keep the temp down that low his engine won't hit 170*, which is the point where the computer shifts from open to closed loop. The engine will ignore his 02 sensors and instead use it's lookup tables. Second scenario is that his cooling setup can't efficiently keep the temp down that low. The tstat eventually stays wide open due to temp which doesn't allow the coolant to stay in the rad long enough to dispel enough heat. Temp goes up and he possibly overheats.
At the same time, @ 190* the computer pulls 2* of timing. This is why tmoss has stated that 180* tstat is best for performance applications.
BTW, These figures are for the A9L. He's done the MAF conversion so I assume this is what he's got.